Justin Trudeau has been facing challenges, notably with lower attendance at his fundraisers, leading to reduced ticket prices. Contrary to earlier reports of Pierre Poilievre having a tough time, recent results actually indicate it’s been his best week. Trudeau’s popularity and his party’s ratings have hit record lows, prompting discussions about the disconnect between the Liberal Party and the public.
And folks do you remember when every single headline was coming out talking about Pierre Poilievre’s terrible week? There’s been a discrepancy between the initial media narrative and the actual situation regarding it. A recent report from the Peterborough Examiner highlighted his challenging week, stating, “For all of us, some weeks are simply better than others. Just ask Pierre Poilievre, leader of the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada. Last week was not a good week for him.”
However, this stands in contrast to the current understanding that it was, in fact, a positive period for Poilievre.
Guess who’s at an all time lows in polling and approval ratings? Justin Trudeau and the liberals. Today let’s highlight how out of touch and delusional the liberal media and the liberals are.
Following the media’s previous narrative criticizing Pierre Poilievre’s leadership potential, recent data challenges their portrayal. Despite reports of a challenging week for Poilievre, new information from an Abacus poll reveals a significant surge for the Conservative Party.
According to the poll, if an election occurred presently, committed voters indicate a notable preference for the Conservatives, standing at 42%. In contrast, the Liberals tally at 23%, the NDP at 19%, and the Greens at 5%. Specifically, in Quebec, the BQ stands at 32%. Notably, the Conservatives have experienced a 3-point increase since the last survey, while other parties have seen a 1-point decrease. This marks the Conservative Party’s most substantial lead over the Liberals since the latter’s election in 2015.
Surprisingly, despite media reports of Poilievre’s supposed ‘terrible week,’ his standing in the poll now reaches 42%. In contrast, both Justin Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh have encountered a 1% decline in their standings. The disparity between media portrayal and public sentiment is evident in these statistics.
The media’s recent portrayal of Pierre Poilievre reflects a willingness to fabricate information and live in their echo chambers, potentially indicating their struggle against Poilievre’s rising influence. Poilievre’s strength lies in his effective communication, popularity, and extensive social media engagement, posing a significant challenge to the left.
Join us on Telegram: https://t.me/tfiglobal
For instance, consider Poilievre’s video on “Housing Hell: How we got here and to Get Out.” This video amassed impressive engagement metrics: 2.9 million views, 6.9 thousand retweets, and 15 thousand likes. In contrast, Justin Trudeau’s video on the same topic on the same day garnered significantly lower engagement with 239 thousand views, 1,300 likes, and 1,800 comments. The disparity in engagement numbers between Poilievre and Trudeau is apparent across platforms. On YouTube, Poilievre’s video amassed 172 thousand views in a day, while Trudeau’s video, released two days earlier, garnered a mere 2.8 thousand views.
These substantial differences in engagement metrics highlight the substantial advantage Poilievre holds over Trudeau in online influence and reach. Despite attempts by the mainstream media to negatively portray Poilievre, his consistent success in garnering public attention remains evident.
However Justin Trudeau’s woes don’t end here. Recent reports indicate a substantial shift in Trudeau’s fundraising strategy, with lowered ticket prices to his events becoming the latest development.
A mere week ago, Trudeau faced criticism for hosting what was deemed an “out of touch” fundraiser, where ticket prices soared as high as $1,700 per person. Titled “An Evening with Justin Trudeau,” the event aimed to highlight the Liberals’ commitment to enhancing affordability for Canadians. However, the irony wasn’t lost on many as attendees had to fork out hefty sums, $1,700 for regular admission and $850 for those aged 35 and below.
“$850 for ages under 35 is a steal. What an incredibly charitable discount,” one person sarcastically wrote on X.
Trudeau’s response to this seems to be a drastic reduction in ticket prices, now available for $1,000. This adjustment raises questions about the initial pricing strategy. Is this change an acknowledgment of dwindling interest in attending these events? It appears that Trudeau’s gatherings have struggled to draw substantial crowds, a trend observed in multiple instances.
Trudeau’s fundraising challenges and dwindling event attendance contrast sharply with Pierre Poilievre’s surging engagement and growing influence, reflecting a potential shift in public support toward Poilievre’s platform. Now these indicators are underscoring a notable Poilievre momentum in Canada’s political landscape.
Watch More:
https://youtu.be/otNr-Ez7e4A?si=MKOOzzqkDDDT4DCh