Get ready, America! Uncle Joe’s got a holiday surprise: cough up billions for Ukraine or face Putin at your doorstep. Forget the corruption, forget the cost, forget logic – just send the money or watch Putin ruin your Christmas! Biden’s fearmongering is reaching new heights, painting a picture of Russian hordes ravaging Europe and Alaska. But is this realpolitik or just the deep state playing puppeteer? Don’t be fooled by Biden’s holiday charade – the truth may be colder than a Siberian winter.
The US Congress is deadlocked over further aid to Ukraine. President Biden seeks $37 billion, encompassing military, humanitarian, and economic aid whereas Republicans propose $10 billion, prioritizing economic issues at home. The deadlock has frustrated President Biden, who has accused Republicans of being obstructionist and of “playing politics” with the war in Ukraine. He has also said that the delay in aid is hurting the Ukrainian people and could embolden Russia.
And now in his recent press briefing he offered Americans a clear ultimatum.
Here is Joe Biden laying it all out, “Good afternoon everyone, I’d like to speak to you today about an urgent responsibility the Congress has to uphold the National Security needs of the United States and quite frankly of our partners as well. This cannot wait. Congress needs to pass supplemental funding for Ukraine before they break for the holiday recess. It’s as simple as that.
If Putin takes Ukraine he won’t stop there. It’s important to see the long run here. He’s going to keep going. If Putin attacks a NATO Ally — if he keeps going and then he attacks a NATO Ally — well, we’ve committed as a NATO member that we’d defend every inch of NATO territory. Then we’ll have something that we don’t seek and that we don’t have today: American troops fighting Russian troops — American troops fighting Russian troops if he moves into other parts of NATO.”
Read More: Germany goes ABSENT from EU meeting to get out of the Ukraine Mess
Ah, did you notice that masterful form of blackmailing? It’s almost a command: ‘Allocate funds to Ukraine, send billions without inquiry, or else I’ll be compelled to deploy American soldiers, risking lives in a conflict against Russia’s Putin-led forces to defend Ukraine.’
If you overlooked that subtle element of coercion, I’d like to highlight Biden’s statement… “we’ve committed as a NATO member that we’d defend every inch of NATO territory. Then we’ll have something that we don’t seek and that we don’t have today: American troops fighting Russian troops — American troops fighting Russian troops..”
The discourse surrounding financial aid to Ukraine pivots on the narrative of deterrence against a projected Russian invasion across Europe, targeting NATO and American allies, and ultimately posing a threat to the United States.
He’s going to attack NATO allies, he’s going to hit American allies and he’s going to hit America. That’s the argument to further westward he’s going to go. They’re not even saying that there’s a chance Putin might do it, they’re saying he will do it. Biden is saying if the US do not send billions of dollars to Ukraine and Ukraine is forced to unconditionally surrender then Putin is going to move into all parts of Europe, he’s going to take over Poland, he’ll go to Germany next, then Lisbon, that’s the plan and oh he’s not going to stop there, he’s coming for Alaska, he’s coming for the United States. Putin is coming for you and this is what they’re hoping you’ll believe. They’ve gone off the deep end with this rhetoric.
The issue at hand revolves around misconceptions regarding Russia’s territorial intentions, particularly their lack of expressed interest in expanding beyond the disputed Donbass region. Contrary to popular belief, there has been no official indication from the Russian government suggesting a desire for extensive territorial expansion. The narrative portraying Putin’s actions as land-driven expansion is misguided.
This viewpoint resonates consistently within the White House, aligning with neoconservative talking points. The unity of opinion between neoconservatives and the White House reflects a narrative propagated by entities influenced and supported by the military-industrial complex. This is the Deep State doing its speaking through these mouthpieces. No one better to pull this off than John Kirby. Listen to what he says, “Putin hasn’t given up his strategic goal of subjugating the entire country; he doesn’t believe it ought to exist as a sovereign state. And so, if we can’t support Ukraine, their chief advisor yesterday said they’re likely to lose this war if they lose U.S. support.
And if Putin gets all of Ukraine, then what? Then where does he go? Because right then, he’s up against the eastern flank of NATO. And if you think the cost of supporting Ukraine is high now, just imagine how much higher it’s going to be — not just in national treasure, but in American blood.
Read More: So, you thought the Biden administration is helping Ukraine fight Russia. Well, it’s not
American boots would very much have to be involved if Mr. Putin is let to — have this strategic victory in Ukraine, and then perhaps goes after one of our NATO Allies.”
The underlying message is stark: without financial support, the alternative is the deployment of American troops. Additionally, there’s a contention that the assertion about Ukraine reclaiming territory is false; there’s been no evidence of such reclamation. The implication seems to suggest an acceptance of Ukrainian casualties in pursuit of American interests. However, the threshold for deploying American troops appears to signify an escalation to a full-scale war.
Watch More:
