US intelligence agencies have spent nearly three years in pursuit of a crucial binder linked to the ‘Russiagate’ investigation, according to CNN. This folder, assembled by House Republicans in 2018, holds information on the FBI’s counterintelligence inquiry into Trump’s campaign, later evolving into the ‘Russiagate’ probe by Special Counsel Robert Mueller. The contentious demand by former President Donald Trump to declassify the binder faced internal resistance, leading to its disappearance, as reported by CNN.
While a portion of the binder has been disclosed, a specific section containing “raw intelligence” on Russians and their agents remains undisclosed. Approximately one-fifth of the binder’s contents have been publicly shared, exposing the flawed foundation of the investigation based on the unfounded notion of Russian interference in the 2016 election. Intriguingly, the CIA allegedly restricted access to this unrevealed section, allowing Republicans only a glimpse in a secure location at the agency’s Langley, Virginia headquarters. The mystery surrounding this untapped intelligence continues to fuel speculation.
Join us on Telegram: https://t.me/tfiglobal
Despite this, the “intelligence community” maintained that the undisclosed files within the binder provided evidence supporting the assertion that “Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016.”
Read More: CIA and FBI have been modifying Wikipedia articles since 2007, admits Wiki’s co-founder
In the days preceding his departure from the White House, Trump issued a directive for the declassification of the binder’s contents. This move, as reported by CNN, triggered a sense of panic within US intelligence agencies. CIA Director Gina Haspel, FBI Director Christopher Wray, and NSA Director Gen. Paul Nakasone hastily convened on Capitol Hill to express their deep concerns to congressional intelligence leaders regarding the potential release of the material, as outlined by CNN.
The potential impact of releasing the undisclosed section remains uncertain, but Trump’s inclination to share it with Republican lawmakers and conservative journalists implies it could have fortified his narrative that the Russiagate investigation was a baseless “hoax” and a politically motivated “witch hunt.”
According to CNN sources, a copy of the binder reached the White House shortly before Trump’s departure. The president, overseeing the final redactions, tasked his chief of staff, Mark Meadows, with distributing copies to journalists. Allegedly, conservative journalist John Solomon received a copy, only for a subsequent intervention by a Secret Service agent, who retrieved it the following day and returned it to the White House. The sequence of events adds a layer of intrigue to the ongoing saga surrounding the Russiagate investigation and the elusive binder.
The elusive binder, integral to the ‘Russiagate’ investigation, remains beyond the reach of US authorities. Recent reports by CNN suggest that the document, sought for over two years, has yet to surface. Notably, it was not discovered during the FBI’s search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate last year. Assertions by CNN propose that Mark Meadows, Trump’s former chief of staff, may possess the binder, a claim staunchly refuted by Meadows’ legal representation.
The US government is actively engaged in efforts to locate and retrieve the elusive binder, as per CNN’s recent disclosure. The timing of these revelations, however, raises questions about the motivation behind the sudden public discourse on the ongoing search, particularly given the prolonged duration of the investigation.
Read More: Donald Trump: The Unconventional Hero, Entrepreneur, and Political Phenomenon
CNN’s investigative team, comprising Jeremy Herb, Katie Bo Lillis, Natasha Bertrand, Evan Perez, and Zachary Cohen, has a history of reporting information leaked by intelligence sources, particularly during Trump’s presidency. Bertrand, in particular, played a notable role in amplifying unverified claims during the Russiagate episode.
Richard Grenell, Trump’s former director of national intelligence, deems it a “partisan attack” from within the intelligence community. Meanwhile, Republican pollster Rich Barris dismisses it as a “continuation of the Russia hoax,” expressing incredulity at the persistence of similar tactics over time. The unfolding narrative underscores the enduring controversy surrounding ‘Russiagate’ and its intricate web of political implications.
Recommended Video:
