TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Time for the US to Exit Middle Eastern Affairs

Anushka Gupta by Anushka Gupta
May 31, 2024
in Geopolitics
Time for the US to Exit Middle Eastern Affairs
Share on FacebookShare on X

Recent U.S. efforts to normalize relations between Saudi Arabia and Israel have faltered following the October 7 attack, complicating the ability to meet Saudi Arabia’s demands. The U.S. has played a significant role in the Middle East for decades which have often resulted in the opposite, creating societal divisions, arming conflicting groups, and making the region more chaotic and dangerous.

It is high time for the U.S. to step back and retrench within its own borders. Its imperial overstretch has led to its own decline, and it now lacks the capability to protect its Middle Eastern allies and even the Americans living there. The U.S. is now in competition with other powers expanding their influence in the Middle East like China who has brokered a peace deal between Saudi Arabia and Iran, the Russia-led BRICS has established connections with many middle east countries, and India’s transit corridors are making significant inroads in the region.

Also Read

France and Saudi Arabia Seek to Disarm Hamas, Push for Political Role in Gaza

Netanyahu Outlines Conditions for Ending Gaza War, Says Entire Strip Will Be Under IDF Control

US backed military general Joseph Aoun takes charge of Lebanon

Momentum toward Israeli-Saudi normalization halted after Hamas’ October 7 attack on Israel. U.S. and Saudi diplomats suggest they are close to reaching bilateral agreements as part of a broader normalization deal, which is far from true as US is stepping back from an extremely close relationship with the Saudis. As achieving such a deal would essentially require Washington to offer significant incentives to Riyadh. This pursuit raises questions about U.S. priorities amid ongoing regional tensions.

The Saudis seek formal U.S. security guarantees, support for developing a civilian nuclear program, and access to advanced computer chips for AI technology. This Saudi interest in Israeli concessions for a two-state solution raises skepticism, as Riyadh, once staunchly demanding a two-state solution, now appears willing to negotiate for its own benefits. Riyadh is now considering a “plan B” option, which could potentially sideline the Palestinian cause altogether, further complicating the region’s dynamics.

The U.S. is also facing heightened geopolitical competition with other major players. Beijing has successfully brokered a détente between Saudi Arabia and Iran, showcasing China’s growing influence in the region. Additionally, Riyadh’s decision to join the Russian-led BRICS bloc signals a significant shift in its alliances, moving closer to powers that are traditionally seen as competitors to the U.S. Moreover, Saudi Arabia is a major partner of India, which has actively worked to secure the Red Sea from Houthi attacks on crucial shipping routes. These developments indicate a multi-polar power structure emerging in the Middle East, diminishing U.S. dominance.

Washington’s continued involvement in the region will only stretches its military and economic resources. A re-evaluation of U.S. foreign policy priorities is necessary to adapt to the changing global landscape and to ensure that American actions are aligned with its long-term strategic interests.

The U.S.’s military-dominated posture in the Middle East has consistently failed to provide education and social development to the region’s people. Currently, around 40,000 U.S. military personnel are stationed in the Middle East, with troops in Iraq and Syria being particularly vulnerable to attacks from the Axis of Resistance. A deadly attack on a U.S. outpost along the Jordan-Syria border this year underscores this vulnerability. The continued presence of U.S. troops serves little purpose and poses an unacceptable risk of escalation and further entanglement in regional conflicts, which US cannot afford.

The financial costs and risks associated with defending Saudi Arabia under a normalization deal are much higher than what the U.S. can reasonably afford. Entering such agreements obligates the U.S. to commit resources and military support in ways that may not align with its strategic interests. Additionally, the U.S. practically cannot expect other nations to consistently align their foreign policy decisions with American interests, especially when those interests’ conflict with their own.

The complexity and inherent risks of such an agreement highlight the urgent need for a re-evaluation of U.S. capabilities and strategies in the region. It is imperative for the U.S. to reconsider its approach and acknowledge the limitations of its influence and effectiveness in the Middle East. This re-evaluation should prioritize withdrawing from unsustainable commitments and focusing on diplomatic and humanitarian efforts that can genuinely foster long-term stability and development in the region.

 

 

Tags: Israel-HamasMiddle EastSaudi-IsraelUS withdrawalUS-IsraelWeakening US
ShareTweetSend
Anushka Gupta

Anushka Gupta

Anushka is Consulting Associate Editor at TFI Media, specializing in geopolitics and international relations. She completed her masters from JMI in IR where she developed writing skills, her previous internships helped her to gain research and editing skills. She intends to bring out the truth about global dynamics and changing world order, along with bringing fresh ideas and perspective.

Also Read

RIC Revival: Russia looks to bring in China and India to resurrect the RIC trio

RIC Revival: Russia looks to bring in China and India to resurrect the RIC trio

May 31, 2025
UK to go on the offensive, will initiate cyberattacks on Russia and China

UK to go on the offensive, will initiate cyberattacks on Russia and China

May 31, 2025
Russia rewards it soldiers for F-16 takedowns as S-400 proves it capabilities against Ukraine and Pakistan

Russia rewards it soldiers for F-16 takedowns as S-400 proves it capabilities against Ukraine and Pakistan

May 31, 2025
Israel Approves 22 New Settlements in West Bank

Israel Approves 22 New Settlements in West Bank Amid International Concerns

May 30, 2025
Vucic betrays Putin? Russian agencies find Serbia firms providing ammunition to Ukraine

Vucic betrays Putin? Russian agencies find Serbia firms providing ammunition to Ukraine

May 30, 2025
How Turkey Undermines the Alliances It Claims to Support

Is Turkey Playing Both Sides—or Playing Everyone?

May 30, 2025
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.