TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Why US doesn’t support the idea of a free Balochistan?

Frustmanoos by Frustmanoos
September 18, 2016
in Geopolitics
US Balochistan
Share on FacebookShare on X

Modi’s I-day reference to Balochistan has created palpable excitement throughout the nation. The sense of enthusiasm is understandable as most Indians feel that Pakistan has been allowed to take advantage of India’s righteous behaviour and that it is about time that Pakistan is taught a lesson.

There is also a comprehensible sense of deja vu.

Also Read

Despite pressure from Trump, India rejects US oil opts for $200 mn deal with Nigeria instead

South Korea halts billion dollar US investments, Hyundai arrests shock Seoul as nations doubt US and Trump partnership 

Trump’s Three Deadly Strikes on the European Union: A New Era of Transatlantic Tension

The last time India decided to teach Pakistan a lesson, it ended up splitting that country into two. Many expect that Modi’s reference to Balochistan will eventually result in another collapse of our western neighbour, resulting in Balochistan’s liberation from Pakistani military’s vice-like grip.

The more excitable amongst us believe that India is poised for a military action against Pakistan and the liberation of Quetta will happen on the likes of liberation of Dhaka more than 4 decades ago.

Already, protests by Sindhis and Balochis in Europe and even in Pakistan are arousing the curiosity of our media channels, which hitherto have been busy criticizing Modi.

Therefore, it came as quite a dampener to hear the US take Pakistan’s side on the Balochistan issue. In a terse statement, the US made it clear that it does not support an independent Balochistan.

Obviously, the anti-Modi brigade hopped on to US’s statement to portray it as a major setback to Modi government’s policy.

But, realistically speaking, anybody who had hoped that Modi’s I-day reference to Balochistan would work like a magic wand, resulting in instant independence for Balochistan and prompt collapse of Pakistan, was either high on drugs or a complete nincompoop.

For starters, if this was how international diplomacy worked, we would have had an independent Kurdistan, an independent Chechnya and more disastrously, perhaps an independent Kashmir.

In fact, US’s position on Balochistan in along the expected lines. US cannot be expected to support India’s stand, even if it is not in its own national interests.

Following are the reasons why an independent Balochistan cannot be an international priority right now-

  1. Pakistan is a US ally

While US and Pakistan are going through a rough patch right now, historically, US and Pakistan have been the best of chums. In fact, historically, US’s stand on Kashmir has matched Pakistan’s position more closely than it has India’s.

At a time when the US is embroiled in multiple conflicts the world over (Libya, Yemen, Iraq, Syria, China, North Korea etc.), it would surely not want to rouse the animosity of an N-powered Pakistan.

Even the Gods above do not know the levels of lunacy to which those crazy Mullahs and deranged generals in Pakistan are capable of stooping.

  1. The China factor

China and Pakistan are the closest of partners because of the intense hatred for India. For China, Pakistan is clearly a tool to keep India in check.

The US realizes this uncontested fact, but is pretty much powerless before China. The rise of China in the international sphere has coincided with US’s increasing enervation.

While the US keeps outraging Chinese sensitivities on a number of issues, Balochistan is an issue, which is far too unimportant for the US to engage in to raise China’s hackles.

For China, Balochistan is a gateway, linking its troubled Xinjiang region to the Indian Ocean.

It has already invested billions on building the Gwadar port and is still spending billions on infrastructure and exploration in the strife torn province. From China’s perspective, if Balochistan were to fall today, what is the guarantee that Pakistan would be able to guarantee security in the contested Gilgit-Baltistan region tomorrow?

Balochistan, therefore is of paramount strategic importance for China and of relatively no significance for the US. The boat of US-China relations is always in choppy waters and the US might not, right now, want to rock it further.

  1. Oh, Balochistan!

Unlike how Indian public understands it, Balochistan is not merely a province of Pakistan. The Balochistan region, in reality is divided between Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan. Around 48% of Pakistan’s Balochistan is inhabited by Baloch people.

It is believed that Pashtuns form Pakistani Balochistan’s majority. In Afghanistan too, there are 2 lakh Balochis in its Nimruz province. Iran’s Sistan o Baluchestan is the Baloch majority part of the country.

Any attempt to liberate Pakistani Balochistan will inevitably have a cascading effect on the Balochistans in Afghanistan and Iran.

US has only recently managed to wriggle out of Afghanistan after having bloodied its nose in trying to pacify the country. Iran, for long US’s pathological foe has only now begun to turn around.

From US’s perspective, an independent Balochistan might not be cardinal enough to destabilize Afghanistan (again!) and irredeemably ruin its rudimentary relations with Iran.

On deeper thought, an independent Balochistan might not serve India’s best interests as well. While everyone gets misty eyed about India’s role in liberating Bangladesh, one must contend with the fact that Bangladesh has not been India’s most dependable friend.

In fact, covertly and overtly, Bangladesh, for many years, followed Pakistan’s policy by arming insurgents in the North East. Even today, were Begum Khaleda Zia return to power in Bangladesh, Indo-Bangladeshi relations are bound to sour.

Our strategists must debate whether an independent Balochistan is in our best national interests.

Given that countries in the Islamic world are notorious for rejecting democracy and embracing Islamic fundamentalism, will India end up adding, in the form of perhaps an Islamic Republic of Balochistan, another rogue state lined up against it?

Will such a state, like a domino effect, destabilize Afghanistan and further radicalize Pakistan? It might make infinitely better sense for India to use Balochistan as a strategic lever against Pakistan to discipline it, like a father does to his son.

Of course, if the son is pathologically delinquent, it might call for stringent steps. But one should consider those steps when one crosses that bridge.

For now, India’s interests are best served by exposing Pakistan and shaming it on the world stage.

Tags: PakistanUS
ShareTweetSend
Frustmanoos

Frustmanoos

Extra terrestrial left behind during a surreptitious visit by a trans-Neptunian race.

Also Read

Hanged Over a Letter to Zelenskyy"? Iran Executes Man Accused of Espionage for Israel. Unravel the mystery behind it 

Hanged Over a Letter to Zelenskyy? Iran Executes Man Accused of Espionage for Israel. Unravel the mystery behind it 

September 17, 2025
Modi vs NATO? India’s Role in Zapad-2025 Sparks Western Outrage but Reality Tells a Different Story

Modi vs NATO? India’s Role in Zapad-2025 Sparks Western Outrage but Reality Tells a Different Story

September 17, 2025
India and Airbus solidify billion dollar partnership as orders for 100s of new aircrafts help the the Airline maufacturer zoom ahead of its rivals

India and Airbus solidify billion dollar partnership as orders for 100s of new aircrafts help the the Airline maufacturer zoom ahead of its rivals

September 17, 2025
Jewish Israeli Intelligence Officer Ari Ben Menashe claims Israel PM Netanyahu is blackmailing President Trump

Israeli Intelligence Officer Ari Ben Menashe claims Israel PM Netanyahu is blackmailing President Trump

September 16, 2025
Jeffrey Sachs claims French President Emmanuel Macron privately admitted NATO is to blame for the Ukraine war. Did NATO’s expansion provoke the conflict long before 2022?

American Economist Jeffrey Sachs reveals that Macron admitted in private that NATO triggered the Ukraine war, fueling claims of Western hypocrisy and a proxy conflict of NATO vs Russia 

September 16, 2025
How China “Shot Down” the F-35 with a Rare-Earth Missile ?

How China “Shot Down” the F-35 with Rare-Earth Missile?

September 16, 2025
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.