TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
[tfi_websites]
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Did Nancy Pelosi have information about a possible siege at the Capitol Hill and still chose to stay mum for political benefits?

Akshay Narang by Akshay Narang
February 17, 2021
in Americas
Nancy Pelosi, Capitol Hill Siege
Share on FacebookShare on X

The Capitol siege started with a backlash against former US President Donald Trump. But now it is becoming a contentious political issue. Now House GOP leaders are asking questions of Nancy Pelosi about security decisions in the run-up to the Capitol siege. On Monday, several ranking House members sent a letter to Pelosi, the House Speaker, and asked her to answer “many important questions” regarding security decisions before Capitol riots.

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes, House Administration Committee Ranking Member Rodney Davis, House Oversight Committee Ranking Member James Comer and House Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Jim Jordan were the four Republicans who signed the letter sent to Pelosi. 

Also Read

Capitol Chaos Chronicles: Who’s Really to Win in Blame Game?

Chrystia Freeland will Defeat Putin

Zelensky’s Shocking Military Move: Butcher or Savior? Meet Ukraine’s New Commander-in-Chief!

The Republicans pointed to a claim by former Capitol Police Chief Steve Sund that he had approached the sergeants at arms on January 4, that is, two days before the Capitol siege, with a proposal to request the assistance of the National Guard. As per Fox News, Sund also wrote a letter to Pelosi last month, in which he disclosed that the former Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving expressed concern about “the optics” and didn’t feel the “intelligence supported it.”

House GOP leaders also wrote, “As you are aware, the Speaker of the House is not only the leader of the majority party but also has enormous institutional responsibilities.” They added, “The Speaker is responsible for all operational decisions made within the House.”

Republican leaders are really looking to grill the House Speaker Pelosi over the issue and also asking her to come clean on the serious security breach. The House GOP leaders added that over the past two years, they have observed a “very heavy-handed and tightly controlled approach to House operations that has been exerted by yourself, your staff, and an army of appointed House officials.”

Finally, they asked some pertinent questions from Pelosi. The Republican leaders wrote, “When then-Chief Sund made a request for national guard support on January 4th, why was that request denied?” They added, “Did Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving get permission or instruction from your staff on January 4th prior to denying Chief Sund’s request for the national guard?”

Questions are being raised outside the house too. Rep. Jim Jordan tweeted, “Capitol Police requested National Guard help prior to January 6th. That request was denied by Speaker Pelosi and her Sergeant at Arms. During the attack, Capitol Police made the request again. It took over an hour to get approval from Pelosi’s team!”

Jordan also alleged, “On January 7th, Speaker Pelosi claimed that the Capitol Police Chief hadn’t called since the attack. We now know that’s not true. Chief Sund briefed Pelosi’s team twice during the attack! First at 5:36 p.m. and again at 6:25 p.m.”

Capitol Police requested National Guard help prior to January 6th.

That request was denied by Speaker Pelosi and her Sergeant at Arms.

During the attack, Capitol Police made the request again.

It took over an hour to get approval from Pelosi’s team! https://t.co/ctOWZ4PExw

— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) February 15, 2021

Pelosi’s office has however failed to give a satisfactory reply to the questions raised by the ranking members. All that her office has managed is an arrogant reply that actually leaves most of the questions unanswered. 

In a rather political reply, Pelosi’s office said that House Republicans, who wrote the strongly worded letter to Pelosi, were “clearly” trying to “deflect responsibility for the Capitol attack from Donald Trump.”

Pelosi’s deputy chief of staff, Drew Hammill, told Fox News that the Speaker “has and will continue to take action to ensure accountability and enhance the security of the Capitol.”

And then, Hammill also tried to pass a judgment on the character and intent of the GOP leaders who questioned Pelosi. Hammill said, “Two of the four House Republican ranking members voted to overturn the results of a fair election, just hours after the Capitol was sacked by an insurrectionist, right-wing mob – a mob incited by Trump.”

Then he added, “A full 65% of House Republicans joined them in voting to undermine our democracy. All four ranking members also voted against holding Donald Trump accountable for inciting the mob.” Finally, Pelosi’s deputy chief of staff said, “Clearly, the security of our Capitol and democracy are not the priorities of these ranking members.”

So, basically, Pelosi believes that House GOP leaders cannot ask any questions about how the House Speaker is discharging her functions. A lot many questions remain unanswered and the unconvincing reply coming from Pelosi’s office only makes the situation more intricate. 

Tags: Capitol HillNancy PelosiShort takes
ShareTweetSend
Akshay Narang

Akshay Narang

Patriot, Political Analyst, International Relations expert

Also Read

Brazil election 2026 — political leaders face off against a backdrop of Brazil’s Congress, divided crowds, and national colours symbolising the country’s left-right political

Brazil Election 2026: Is South America Turning Its Back on the Left?

October 5, 2026
Donald Trump gestures towards a darkened Havana skyline and Cuban flag at sunset, symbolising possible US-Cuba negotiations amid economic and political tensions.”

No Troops Needed: Trump Bets on a Cuba Deal as the Island Goes Dark

September 27, 2026
Donald Trump boards a presidential aircraft as journalists and television cameras watch from behind a barrier on the tarmac.CNN

Grounded: White House shuts CNN out of Air Force One days After Court Win

September 27, 2026
A gavel and futuristic AI figure in front of the Pentagon, with US military personnel and an American flag in the background, symbolising the legal dispute between Anthropic and the US Department of Defense.

Blow For Anthropic As US Court Refuses To Lift Pentagon Ban

September 26, 2026
Judge holding a gavel as journalists face a White House security gate, symbolising a legal battle over press access under President Trump

Judge Tears Down Trump’s White House Ban, Orders Barred Reporters Back In

September 25, 2026
US President Donald Trump cuts a red ribbon outside the White House as television cameras and microphones sit unused, with Marine One in the background, symbolising a media blackout.

Networks Pull The Plug: Trump Loses His Microphone After White House Press Ban

September 22, 2026
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

[tfi_copyright]

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
[tfi_websites]

[tfi_copyright]

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.