While Germany’s position as an industrial powerhouse stretches back centuries, whispers of its “reign coming to an end” have started to resonate increasingly loudly. Once synonymous with precision engineering and robust manufacturing, the nation now navigates a turbulent landscape.
Speaking at a recent Bloomberg event, Germany’s finance minister Christian Lindner hinted at the country’s downward spiral. He says the country is no longer competitive and is falling behind economically. Germany’s reign as an industrial superpower is “coming to an end.”
The EU’s economic giant will eventually suffer from a protracted period of little to no expansion, according to Lindner, who also serves as the leader of the Free Democratic Party of the nation.
“We are no longer competitive,” Linder said. “We are getting poorer because we have no growth. We are falling behind.”
His remarks coincide with the release of a gloomy outlook by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which cut its forecast for German growth this year by half to just 0.3%. This is significantly less than the 2.9% growth it expects for the G20 and even less than the 0.6% growth it projects for the Eurozone.
Read More: A one German publication is turning Germany into a land of chaos
In the meantime, it is anticipated that this week’s industrial production figures will be the lowest since 2008, a year in which the fallout from the global financial crisis severely damaged German industry.
Destatis published official preliminary statistics in January that indicated a 0.3% decline in price-adjusted GDP in the previous year. In the meantime, there was a 2% decline in industrial output (apart from construction), which was mostly caused by significantly decreased output in the energy supply sector.
Deindustrialization is encroaching upon the largest economy in Europe, and it’s struggling to ward off this trend. Let’s explore the factors contributing to this situation. Taking a journey back in time to post-World War II, Germany underwent significant political and social transformations, dismantling the Nazi regime and establishing a democratic West Germany. These changes bolstered confidence in Germany’s peaceful intentions, fostering international cooperation, economic integration, and prosperity without nurturing political ideologies. As countries planted the seeds of unity, Germany reconstructed critical infrastructure, attracting American and European firms with skilled labor, stable policies, and a central European location, turning it into a hub of high-tech industries. However, the 2008 financial crisis dealt a severe blow, impacting Germany’s export-reliant economy, leading to a sharp GDP decline in 2009, exposing vulnerabilities in its financial system and reigniting debates on austerity and fiscal responsibility within the EU.
Join us on Telegram: https://t.me/tfiglobal
Germany was just catching its breath after the 2008 financial crisis when the 2015 immigration crisis struck. Angela Merkel swung open the doors, ushering in a wave of immigrants that reshaped the country’s economic identity. The shift from a staunchly capitalist ethos to one embracing welfare principles was like a seismic ripple, leaving some to argue that it dealt a blow to the country’s economic vigor.
Embracing a substantial influx of immigrants demanded a hefty investment cocktail in vital sectors such as housing, education, and healthcare, inevitably applying pressure on public budgets, particularly in the initial stages. The dynamics of the labor market underwent a metamorphosis, with dissenting voices contending that the arrival of newcomers sparked competition with low-skilled native workers, a scenario that exerted a downward force on wages. As cultures intertwined, anxieties about assimilation and cultural integration started emerging as potential flashpoints, igniting social tensions and casting shadows of political instability. Such apprehensions casted ripples across the economic landscape, impacting confidence and investments in unforeseen ways.
Then came Chancellor Scholz whose role in Germany’s economic recovery seemed pretty hands-off. People were expecting more proactive leadership, but Scholz didn’t quite deliver. Whether it was a lack of fresh ideas or not dealing with pressing economic issues, he didn’t give off the vibe of someone who was on top of things. His time in charge is always leaving folks questioning if he is really committed to getting Germany back on its feet. Germany’s economy took a hit during the 2020 COVID-19 crisis, and the repercussions are still lingering. However, Olaf Scholz’s response to the ongoing economic challenges has been met with criticism for its perceived lack of effectiveness. Despite the pressing need for robust measures to counter the aftermath of the pandemic, Scholz’s initiatives have been viewed as slow-moving.
Germany suffered its first recession since the start of the pandemic, extinguishing hopes that Europe’s top economy could escape such a fate after the war in Ukraine sent energy prices soaring.
First-quarter output shrank 0.3% from the previous three months following a 0.5% drop between October and December. The result was a setback for Germany, which despite escaping the bleakest scenarios feared in the aftermath of Russia-Ukraine war.
Manufacturers who were previously having difficulty staying cost-competitive are now suffering a “final blow” due to the lack of inexpensive Russian natural gas in the midst of the Ukraine crisis.
Germany’s industrial output has been declining since 2017, and since Moscow cut off gas imports in 2022 as retaliation for the conflict in Ukraine, the decline has increased. According to Bloomberg, firms are shifting their production lines to countries with lower prices as century-old enterprises close.
“There’s not a lot of hope, if I’m honest,” Stefan Klebert, CEO at machinery maker GEA Group AG, told the outlet. “I am really uncertain that we can halt this trend. Many things would have to change very quickly.”
According to a poll conducted by the Federation of German Industries in September of last year, the main reasons for moving investment overseas are energy security and cost concerns. Among the industries most negatively impacted by the loss of Russian gas were chemical manufacturers. The largest chemical makers in Europe, BASF SE, and Lanxess AG, are eliminating thousands of jobs.
Both US competitor Goodyear and French tire manufacturer Michelin are closing or reducing their German operations. According to Bloomberg, Maria Rottger, regional head of Michelin, prices are too high for German exporters to prosper.
“Despite the motivation of our employees, we have arrived at a point where we can’t export truck tires from Germany at competitive prices. If Germany can’t export competitively in the international context, the country loses one of its biggest strengths.”
The German finance minister acknowledged the crisis at a Bloomberg conference earlier this month. “We are no longer competitive,” he said. “We are getting poorer because we have no growth. We are falling behind.”
The fourth quarter of last year saw a contraction in the German economy. According to research by the consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal, 15% of German businesses have troubled balance sheets. According to the business, Germany has the highest distress rate in Europe, up from 9% last year.
Russian President, Vladimir Putin, claimed in December that instead of advancing their own interests through economic cooperation, Western countries are “playing the fool” by hoping for Russia’s collapse at the expense of their own people. He has accused German officials of condoning the bombings of the Nord Stream pipelines, which he placed on the CIA, and of carelessly harming their own economy in response to US pressure.
Read More: In the next 10 yrs. both Germany and France can LEAVE the EU
Bloomberg said German manufacturers also have been hurt by crumbling infrastructure, an aging workforce, bureaucratic red tape, a weakening education system, and increased competition from China.
You see, the EU and China engaged in a trade war which dealt major economic setbacks on Germany’s economy. Decoupling of the EU and Germany from China, resulted in retaliatory measures from the latter that can cost Germany almost six times as much as Brexit. This is the finding of a scenario analysis conducted by the ifo Institute on behalf of the Bavarian Industry Association.
Those in Germany who stand to lose the most in a trade war with China would be the automotive industry (USD −8,306 million), companies producing transportation equipment (USD −1,529 million), and manufacturers of machinery and equipment (USD −5,201 million).
In the grand symphony of challenges, Germany finds itself in the relentless grip of economic strains, with each note playing a discordant melody of setbacks. The nation, already navigating the intricate dance of economic pressures, is now waltzing through a relentless barrage of further setbacks.
