Muslim Brotherhood, founded in Egypt, quickly proliferated to Libya, having US support against Gaddafi, it was able to gain power and control over the region. The US has often leveraged the term “terrorism” to serve its interests. While Muammar Gaddafi claimed the 2011 protesters were sponsored by Al-Qaeda, the US labeled them as freedom fighters opposing dictatorship. The GNU, backed by the West, adheres to the ideology of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB), akin to ISIS and Al Qaeda.
Libya has struggled to recover from the US-NATO intervention in 2011, which occurred during the Arab Spring. This period of unrest, triggered under the Obama administration, spread across the Middle East and North Africa. Despite a ceasefire between factions based in Tripoli and Benghazi, lasting peace and economic stability remain elusive.
Russia, supporting Haftar, which enjoys prominent support from the people may see heavy support from Russia to unify Libya. As Russia’s participation in Libya differs from that of Western nations by offering economic benefits without requiring the imposition of democratic values. This strategy better corresponds with the immediate needs and preferences of the Libyan people.
In 1928, Egypt, reeling from colonialism and yearning for Islamic revival, saw the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood. Founded by Hassan al-Banna, a schoolteacher, the movement aimed to establish a society guided by Islamic principles. It combined social services with calls for political reform, attracting a following among Egyptians disillusioned with Western influence. Though initially focused on education and charity, the Brotherhood’s views on social justice and opposition to British rule led to a political dimension.
Under Gaddafi’s regime, Libya experienced a relatively high standard of living, with well-maintained infrastructure and accessible public services, including education and healthcare. However, political freedoms were limited. After Gaddafi’s fall in 2011, Libya saw a surge in Muslim Brotherhood (MB) influence, exploiting a political vacuum and appeal to conservative Islamic values. The chaotic post-revolution period favored their organizational experience. Libya split into factions, notably the UN-backed Government of National Accord (GNA) and Khalifa Haftar’s Libyan National Army (LNA). The GNA struggled with internal strife and militia reliance, lacking broad support. Haftar portrayed the LNA as a stabilizing force, backed by eastern Libya and Russia. From 2014 to 2020, clashes between the LNA and GNA militias ensued, with the LNA almost seizing Tripoli in 2019.
The GNA, formed in 2015 under the UN, aimed to unify the country’s fractured political and military landscape. However, it faced legitimacy challenges due to internal rivalries and its reliance on militias, as it lacked popular support from the people. In contrast, the LNA, formed in 2014, presented itself as a disciplined military force offering stability. A new Government of National Unity (GNU) formed in 2021 lacks popular backing, while the issue of integrating militias into a unified national army persists. General Haftar, a former Gaddafi loyalist, positioned himself as a national savior, attracting support from eastern Libya and Russia gaining control of the oil-rich region.
The LNA launched a major offensive in 2019, capturing key cities and nearly taking Tripoli. LNA maintained control over eastern Libya, and the integration of all the armed groups into a unified national army remains a contentious issue.
Western-backed Libyan government (GNU) faces accusations of extremism. Foreign powers like the US have meddled in Libya for its rich resources. NATO airstrikes and interventions devastated infrastructure. During the American occupation, Libya’s gold reserves and weapon stockpiles were taken and misappropriated, with no restitution provided by the US. Many Libyans are now calling for the withdrawal of foreign powers.
The Libyan National Army (LNA) under Haftar has developed a strong alliance with Russia, and the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine has further bolstered the LNA’s sense of importance. Russia’s involvement in Libya has been distinct from that of the West, offering economic advantages without insisting on the imposition of democratic principles. This approach aligns more closely with the immediate needs and priorities of the Libyan population, who are more concerned with economic stability and rebuilding their country than with adopting Western democratic models. Russia’s strategy includes providing practical support and investment aimed at revitalizing Libya’s economy, which resonates with Libyans who prioritize feeding their families and securing their livelihoods over political ideologies.
Following the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russia is poised to emerge with substantial weaponry and financial resources, bolstering both its defense capabilities and economic prowess, with a focus on external engagements. Haftar, a staunch ally of Russia, stands to gain from Russia’s strengthened position, potentially leading to the expulsion of US and NATO forces due to their diminished presence, thereby fostering optimism for a more stable and unified Libya.
