TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Did Israel, U.S. Airstrikes Push Iran Toward Nuclear Weapons?

Smriti Singh by Smriti Singh
June 26, 2025
in Geopolitics
Iran's Nuclear Calculus After U.S. and Israeli Attacks

Iran's Nuclear Calculus After U.S. and Israeli Attacks

Share on FacebookShare on X

The shadow of a nuclear-armed Iran looms larger than ever, not because the Islamic Republic suddenly became more belligerent, but because the West — particularly the U.S. and Israel — abandoned the very framework that once held the bomb at bay. With Israel’s “Operation Rising Lion” and the U.S.’s “Operation Midnight Hammer” targeting Iran’s nuclear sites, the international community may have witnessed the final unraveling of any hope for sustained nonproliferation diplomacy in the Middle East.

As these strikes were not surgical solutions to a looming threat. They were acts of geopolitical desperation. And like all acts of desperation, they are likely to backfire.

Also Read

Russia has launched Iran’s Nahid-2 communication satellite. Is it for Tehran to spy on Israel-US, or a nuclear test in North Korean Style?

Mossad’s Drone Base Inside Iran: How Israel Struck from Within?

How Did 15 Years of U.S. Planning Lead to Strike on Iran’s Nuclear Site?

The Fallout of Force

Military interventions have a track record when it comes to nuclear development: they delay but rarely deter. Iraq’s clandestine nuclear program only went deeper underground after Israel bombed Osirak in 1981. North Korea accelerated its path to nuclearization after being labeled part of the “Axis of Evil.” And now Iran, whose Supreme Leader once issued a fatwa against nuclear weapons, may finally be abandoning ambiguity for outright pursuit.

The irony is unbearable. The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), signed in 2015, was flawed but functional. It rolled back Iran’s program, subjected it to rigorous IAEA inspections, and created a transparent pathway for monitoring. But it was torn up not because Iran violated its terms, but because of political expedience. President Donald Trump, goaded by Israeli hardliners and domestic hawks, pulled the plug on the deal without a credible alternative.

In doing so, Washington traded a flawed but enforceable treaty for strategic whack-a-mole — a policy of erratic airstrikes and rhetorical bluster, with no long-term strategy beyond “maximum pressure.”

Strengthening the Case for the Bomb

From Iran’s perspective, the conclusion is now self-evident: the only real deterrent to regime change or foreign attack is a nuclear weapon. Iraq didn’t have one. Libya gave up its program. Ukraine surrendered its Soviet-era arsenal. All three were invaded or destabilized. North Korea, on the other hand, has tested nuclear weapons and remains intact, however isolated.

By bombing IAEA-monitored nuclear facilities — ostensibly in the name of nonproliferation — the U.S. and Israel have shredded the credibility of the international arms control regime. Why should any state cooperate with inspectors or agree to limit its enrichment if compliance only paints a target on its back?

Also read: Satellite Images Reveal Uranium Transfer Before U.S. Strikes on Iran’s Fordow Nuclear Site

The Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) rests on a delicate balance: non-nuclear states agree not to develop weapons in exchange for access to civilian nuclear technology and a promise from nuclear states to eventually disarm. Both promises have been broken — especially the latter.

When Rules Don’t Apply Equally

How can the U.S., with thousands of nuclear warheads, credibly demand Iran not even approach breakout capacity? How can Israel, a nuclear-armed state that has never signed the NPT, justify bombing another NPT signatory’s safeguarded sites?

The double standards are not just moral failings; they are strategic liabilities. They erode the legitimacy of global institutions like the IAEA and the United Nations, pushing smaller states toward unilateralism and secrecy.

A New Strategic Landscape

Brahma Chellaney ,An expert on Geopolitics rightly points out that the West’s actions have eliminated the legal and diplomatic scaffolding that once constrained Iran’s nuclear ambitions. If Iran exits the IAEA framework or pulls out of the NPT altogether, it will be following a playbook that major powers helped write.

Worse, this shift will ripple beyond the Persian Gulf. Saudi Arabia has already hinted at pursuing its own program if Iran gets the bomb. Turkey could follow. Egypt may reconsider its options. The world has managed to contain nuclear proliferation for decades — largely through diplomacy and incentives. That era may now be ending.

The Path Not Taken

The only long-term solution to Iran’s nuclear ambitions has always been — and remains — diplomacy. Even Kenneth Waltz, the realist scholar who provocatively argued in 2012 that a nuclear-armed Iran might actually stabilize the region, recognized that containment and deterrence require credible policy, not knee-jerk aggression.

It’s not too late to walk back from the brink, but it will take more than sanctions and airstrikes. It will require admitting past mistakes, restoring trust, and recognizing that military might cannot substitute for patient statecraft.

Tags: Iran-Israel conflictU.S. attacks Iran nuclear facility
ShareTweetSend
Smriti Singh

Smriti Singh

Endlessly curious about how power moves across maps and minds

Also Read

PM Modi’s China Visit: What It Means for India, China, Russia, NATO, BRICS, and Trump’s Global Standoff

 PM Modi to Visit China for SCO, First since 2020 Border clash: Trump Pushes India into Russia-China Arms? Can Putin succeed in reviving RIC to counter NATO? 

August 6, 2025
Hungarian PM Orbán Says ‘U.S. President is Not Strong Enough’ To End the War in Ukraine

Hungarian PM Orbán Says ‘U.S. President is Not Strong Enough’ To End the War in Ukraine

August 6, 2025
Trump’s US ambassador to NATO, “Putin is sick, twisted and illogical, now we will sanction his allies” takes aim at India, China and Brazil

Trump’s US ambassador to NATO, “Putin is sick, twisted and illogical, now we will sanction his allies” takes aim at India, China and Brazil

August 6, 2025
Putin Meets U.S. Envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow as Trump’s Ukraine Deadline Looms

Putin Meets U.S. Envoy Steve Witkoff in Moscow as Trump’s Ukraine Deadline nears. Will Russia accept Trump’s NATO ceasefire rules? 

August 6, 2025
Putin Deploys Four Nuclear Bombers Near ‘Europe’ Following Trump’s Submarine Threat

Putin Deploys Four Nuclear Bombers Near ‘Europe’ Following Trump’s Submarine Threat

August 6, 2025
India shuns Trump’s threats as its NSA lands in Russia to fast track S-400 and oil deals, BRICS faces off against NATO?

India shuns Trump’s threats as its NSA lands in Russia to fast track S-400 and oil deals, BRICS faces off against NATO?

August 6, 2025
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.