TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Why Did Netanyahu Leave Washington Without Ceasefire Deal?

While Netanyahu’s visit failed to yield a diplomatic breakthrough, it appeared to bolster his standing at home, reinforcing his alliance with Trump at a time when he faces mounting domestic challenges.

Rashi Randev by Rashi Randev
July 12, 2025
in Geopolitics
Why Did Netanyahu Leave Washington Without Ceasefire Deal?(Picture Credit: The Atlantic)

Why Did Netanyahu Leave Washington Without Ceasefire Deal?

Share on FacebookShare on X

Also Read

‘Anyone Who Attacks us – We attack them’: Netanyahu After Israel Strikes Yemen’s Presidential Palace

Trump Hails Netanyahu as ‘War Hero’ While Israel Officially Approved Plans to Invade Gaza. Is U.S. Supporting this Conquest?

Ukraine’s $150 Billion Peace Cost: Rare Earth Minerals for Trump, Land for Putin. What will Zelensky Get?

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned to Israel empty-handed after several days of high-level negotiations in Washington, D.C., with U.S. officials, including President Donald Trump.

Optimism had been high earlier in the week, with both Israeli and American leaders hinting that a breakthrough with Hamas might be within reach.

However, as the talks progressed, it became clear that fundamental disagreements remained unresolved, preventing any formal ceasefire agreement from materializing.

The Core Deadlocks: Truce Duration, Military Withdrawal, and Aid Delivery

At the heart of the stalemate were persistent disputes over three central issues: the length of any proposed ceasefire, the extent of Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza, and the logistics of delivering humanitarian aid during a pause in hostilities. Mediators from the United States, Egypt, and Qatar continued their efforts but were unable to bridge the gaps on these crucial points.

Before departing Washington, Netanyahu outlined his vision for a temporary 60-day ceasefire, during which Hamas would release approximately half of the estimated 50 hostages still held in Gaza, including both living captives and the remains of the deceased.

Also Read: Trump-Netanyahu Meet: Israel Gaza Ceasefire on Table? Is Iran Next?

However, he was adamant that any truce would not become permanent unless Hamas agreed to disarm and Gaza was thoroughly demilitarized. Netanyahu insisted that negotiations for a lasting peace must be based on what he called “minimal conditions”: Hamas relinquishing its weapons, a demilitarized Gaza, and the elimination of Hamas’s governing and military capabilities.

Hamas Rejection and Sticking Points Over Withdrawal

Hamas swiftly rejected these demands. Senior Hamas official Basem Naim stated unequivocally that disarmament would “never” be on the negotiating table. Another major sticking point was the question of Israeli military withdrawal.

Hamas has called for a complete pullout of Israeli forces from the entire Gaza Strip, while Israel has insisted on maintaining a military presence in certain areas, particularly in the south.

Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz reportedly floated the idea of converting parts of southern Gaza into zones for displaced Palestinians, a proposal that drew sharp criticism and comparisons to modern-day concentration camps from human rights advocates and international observers.

Political Theater in Washington

Netanyahu’s visit marked his third trip to Washington since Trump’s return to the presidency. The visit featured a series of high-profile meetings and symbolic gestures, including Netanyahu’s public call for Trump to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Throughout the trip, Netanyahu repeatedly told reporters that a deal was close, predicting that a 60-day ceasefire and a partial hostage release could be achieved soon.

Also Read: Netanyahu to visit NEW YORK to Challenge Mamdani arrest threat?

U.S. Pushback and Unresolved Objections

Despite the outward show of unity, significant disagreements remained behind the scenes. Trump’s special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, postponed a planned trip to Doha, acknowledging that the talks had not advanced far enough to warrant further negotiations.

The U.S. reportedly objected to Israeli proposals to maintain control over large parts of Gaza, with Witkoff likening one such plan to the controversial “Smotrich plan” championed by Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. In response, Israel submitted a revised proposal in an attempt to address American concerns.

Hamas, for its part, raised additional objections, including skepticism about the continued operation of the Israeli- and U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Fund. The United Nations reported that nearly 800 people had been killed attempting to access aid distribution sites since May.

Hamas also criticized Israel’s refusal to commit to a permanent end to hostilities, a sticking point that U.S. mediators tried to address by offering informal assurances that a ceasefire could be extended beyond the initial 60 days.

Political Calculations and International Repercussions

While Netanyahu’s visit failed to yield a diplomatic breakthrough, it appeared to bolster his standing at home, reinforcing his alliance with Trump at a time when he faces mounting domestic challenges, including a fragile governing coalition and a corruption trial that was postponed due to his travel.

The two leaders maintained a united front, despite Trump’s private frustrations with Israel’s handling of the conflict.

Meanwhile, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced new sanctions against Francesca Albanese, a United Nations expert on the Palestinian territories, in response to her calls for International Criminal Court investigations into Israeli officials and U.S. companies involved in the Gaza conflict.

This move highlighted the broader geopolitical tensions and the increasingly polarized international response to the ongoing war.

Ceasefire Elusive Amid Deep Divisions?

Netanyahu’s latest visit to Washington underscored both the urgency and the complexity of efforts to broker a ceasefire in Gaza. Despite initial optimism, the talks revealed deep divisions over fundamental issues such as military withdrawal, disarmament, and humanitarian access.

As violence and suffering continue in Gaza, the path to a lasting ceasefire remains fraught with obstacles, with both sides holding firm to positions that have so far defied compromise. The diplomatic process, while ongoing, faces significant challenges before any sustainable peace can be achieved.

Tags: CeasefireDonald TrumpGazaIsraelNetanyahu
ShareTweetSend
Rashi Randev

Rashi Randev

Also Read

Trump claims he can “destroy China but is instead choosing to induct 600,000 new Chinese students in US”, as he declares that EU Leaders call him the “President of Europe”

Trump claims he can “destroy China but is instead choosing to induct 600,000 new Chinese students in US”, as he declares that EU Leaders call him the “President of Europe”

August 26, 2025
Trump called Modi four times in recent week, but Modi didn't pick call- FAZ

Trump called Modi four times, but Modi didn’t pick call- German media FAZ claims. India-US strategic fallout?

August 26, 2025
Trump Says Putin Won't Meet Zelenskyy 'Because He Doesn't Like Him'. How Will Peace Prevail In Ukraine?

Trump Says Putin Won’t Meet Zelenskyy ‘Because He Doesn’t Like Him’. How Will Peace Prevail In Ukraine?

August 26, 2025
Trump’s 50% Tariffs on India Take Effect Tomorrow: Why New Delhi Refuses to Bow to US Pressure

Trump’s new 50% Tariffs on India for buying Russian Oil but Modi Refuses to Bow to US Pressure. Strategic Autonomy or BRICS Solidarity? 

August 26, 2025
Trump says ‘China has to give us Magnets (Rare Earth Minerals), If they don’t, then we’ll have to charge them massive tariffs—maybe 200 percent or something’. How Will Beijing Respond?

Trump says ‘China has to give us Magnets (Rare Earth Minerals), If they don’t, then we’ll have to charge them massive tariffs—maybe 200 percent or something’. How Will Beijing Respond?

August 26, 2025
Why Russia-Ukraine Conflict may again Escalate, even After the Peace Deal, Once Trump’s Presidency Ends? 

Why Russia-Ukraine war 2.0 may start again even after the Peace Deal, when Trump’s Presidency Ends? 

August 26, 2025
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.