The much-anticipated meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping in Busan, South Korea, on October 30, 2025, concluded with Beijing walking away with a clear upper hand. The summit, billed as a “G2” gathering by Trump himself, symbolized not just a diplomatic thaw between the world’s two largest economies but also a profound shift in global power dynamics. From tariff cuts to technology concessions and strategic silence on Taiwan, Xi secured significant gains while offering little of tangible value in return.
Trump’s “G2” Remark: Symbolism with Consequences
Even before the summit began, Xi achieved a major symbolic victory. Trump’s social media post declaring, “The G2 will be convening shortly!” effectively placed China on equal footing with the United States — a status Beijing has long coveted.
The “G2” concept, which envisions Washington and Beijing jointly managing global affairs, has been controversial. Critics argue that it sidelines the rest of the world and legitimizes China’s authoritarian influence. Yet, Trump’s endorsement of the idea represented a rhetorical and strategic win for Xi. At a time when the U.S. president has been preoccupied with domestic crises and Caribbean tensions, this declaration reinforced perceptions of America’s retreat from its global leadership role — leaving the Indo-Pacific open for Beijing’s growing influence.
Tariff and Technology Concessions: Xi’s Biggest Wins
At the heart of the Busan talks were trade and technology — two arenas where Trump blinked first.
In exchange for a vague, temporary pause on Chinese export controls over rare earth elements, Trump slashed tariffs on Chinese goods, reducing the overall rate to 47 percent. He also reversed his earlier threat to impose a crippling 100 percent tariff starting November 1. Even more telling was Trump’s decision to cut tariffs on fentanyl-related imports from 20 to 10 percent — a move that benefits Chinese exporters despite America’s domestic opioid crisis.
On the technology front, Trump softened his tone on restricting semiconductor exports. He hinted at possible approval for Nvidia chip sales to China — a stark reversal from his earlier hardline position. More strikingly, he postponed a rule that would have blacklisted several Chinese state-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries.
These steps together signal a major relaxation of the U.S. “tech containment” strategy — something Xi has relentlessly sought amid Washington’s push to decouple critical supply chains.
Strategic Silence on Taiwan
Perhaps the most consequential omission from the Trump–Xi meeting was the total absence of discussion about Taiwan.
By sidestepping the issue, Trump effectively removed one of the last symbolic pillars of U.S. resistance to Chinese expansionism. This silence comes at a time when U.S. intelligence agencies believe Xi has instructed the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to prepare for an invasion of Taiwan by 2027. For Xi, Trump’s failure to even raise the issue was an enormous strategic gain, signaling tacit U.S. disengagement from one of the world’s most volatile flashpoints.
Consolation Prizes for Trump
In return for these sweeping concessions, Xi offered Trump symbolic gestures — more theater than substance.
Beijing promised to delay rare earth export controls for a year and agreed to waive port docking fees temporarily. Xi also pledged to purchase more American agricultural products such as soybeans and sorghum, a standard diplomatic sweetener in U.S.–China trade talks.
While Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent boasted that China would buy 25 million metric tons of soybeans annually over the next three years, the Chinese government’s official statement was noticeably vague — merely noting an agreement to “expand agricultural trade.”
Analysts were quick to highlight the imbalance. Tobin Marcus of Wolfe Research described Xi’s moves as “strategic bait,” noting that China leveraged rare earths and food imports to pressure Trump into tariff relief. Piper Sandler’s Andy Laperriere summed it up bluntly: “China is getting the better of the U.S. in these recent truce negotiations.”
Trump’s Contradictions on Russia and India
One of the summit’s most glaring inconsistencies emerged in Trump’s remarks about Russian oil. He defended China’s purchases of Russian crude — the largest in the world — while simultaneously accusing India of “funding the Russian war in Ukraine.”
As a result, he imposed a 25 percent tariff on Indian goods tied to Russian oil transactions, raising total tariffs on India to 50 percent. The move underscores Washington’s inconsistent application of sanctions and its shifting alliances, further eroding trust among its strategic partners in Asia.
The APEC Contrast: Xi Steps Forward as Trump Steps Back
The contrast between the two leaders became even more striking after the Busan meeting. As Air Force One departed for Washington, Xi’s motorcade sped to the APEC summit in Gyeongju — a symbolic reminder of how China is filling the diplomatic space America is vacating.
At APEC, Xi called on world leaders to “practice true multilateralism” and strengthen the World Trade Organisation (WTO). He portrayed China as a champion of open trade, even as critics like Japan’s foreign ministry accused Beijing of “weaponizing” its economic clout through coercive trade measures.
Trump’s absence from APEC — a forum the U.S. helped found in 1989 — underscored Washington’s waning influence in Asia’s multilateral institutions. While Xi pushed for expanded trade and regional integration, Trump returned home to host the White House Halloween party — a contrast not lost on global observers.
A Shifting World Order
For Beijing, the optics and outcomes of this week’s diplomacy were near perfect. Xi not only extracted economic concessions from Trump but also positioned China as a responsible stakeholder in global governance — a narrative Beijing is eager to promote as U.S. credibility erodes.
Eric Olander of the China Global South Project noted, “Through expanded trade, infrastructure, and logistics, China aims to bind this region so deeply to its economy that disentanglement becomes impossible.”
Yet, many regional players remain uneasy. Japan, South Korea, and Canada all expressed concern over China’s dominance, even as they acknowledged the need for cooperation.
In the end, the Trump–Xi summit in Busan and the subsequent APEC scenes in Gyeongju revealed more than a temporary trade truce — they showcased a world in transition. With Washington stepping back and Beijing stepping up, the 21st-century geopolitical order is increasingly defined by China’s strategic patience and America’s strategic distraction.
For Xi Jinping, the South Korea visit was not just a diplomatic victory — it was a declaration of ascendancy. For Donald Trump, it was a reminder that “America First” may increasingly mean “America alone.”