Diesel, Democrats and Dread: Why American Companies Refuse Russian Diesel

Russian diesel deal

Nobody wants the cargo. Three tankers of Russian fuel are ploughing across the Atlantic. Yet American companies refuse Russian diesel, even at steep discounts. The real reason lies less in Moscow than in Tuesday’s midterm elections.

Russian diesel deal: nobody want to touch

On 9 October, President Donald Trump announced a deal with Vladimir Putin. Russia would supply more than 300,000 tonnes of diesel at once. Another 500,000 tonnes would follow in November, then a million more. The Treasury then issued General License 135, a six-month sanctions exemption.

The first tanker, the Malta-flagged Agioi Fanendes, loaded about 40,000 tonnes at the Baltic port of Primorsk. It should reach New York around 7 November. That date falls four days after voters choose a new Congress.

So far, no American firm has agreed to buy the fuel. Sellers have shopped the cargoes for weeks without success. One industry analyst said they keep hitting ‘a wall of resistance’. After departure, the ship’s Greek manager admitted it had not yet fixed a discharge port. Rapidan Energy Group even expects the cargoes might end up in Brazil.

Why the buyers keep away

Why would businesses spurn cheap fuel in a price crisis? Because Democrats have spent weeks warning them off. On 24 October, five Democratic senators wrote to America’s biggest banks and busiest ports. Jeanne Shaheen led the group, which included Elizabeth Warren, Ron Wyden, Chris Coons and Sheldon Whitehouse. Representative Gregory Meeks joined them, as did one retiring Republican, Thom Tillis.

The recipients included JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs and Citi, plus port authorities in Texas and New York. The letters warned that criminal penalties may apply to any company that knowingly buys Russian diesel. They also told recipients to preserve contracts, payment records and even files on personal devices.

Representative Jamie Raskin went further still. He warned fuel-industry groups of prison terms of up to 20 years. Those who act, he wrote, ‘proceed at their own risk’.

The midterm sword over business

Read those letters closely, and the threat becomes obvious. If Democrats win the Senate, Warren could chair Banking, Wyden Finance and Whitehouse Judiciary. Meeks could seize the Foreign Affairs gavel in the House. The letter-writers, in short, hope to become the investigators.

A Senate Democratic aide has already previewed such a probe. Senator Richard Blumenthal has asked the tanker’s owner to name the buyer, insurer and distributor. The government can also pursue customs penalties for five years. So a firm that buys one cargo now could face trouble until 2031.

Business leaders grasp this perfectly. One Wall Street insider said firms fear ‘what’s going to happen in the next congressional session’. No chief executive wants a starring role at those hearings.

Who gains from high prices?

Now consider the political arithmetic. Diesel averaged $6.35 a gallon in late October, just below September’s record of $6.53. A year earlier, it cost roughly $3.67. Farmers and hauliers feel that pain every day. High fuel prices have also become a major midterm liability for the governing party.

So who gains when Russian barrels never reach an American dock? Not the haulier in Ohio. Not the farmer in Iowa.

The incentives speak loudly. Democrats need painful pump prices to last until Tuesday. Their letters set a response deadline of 28 October, days before the vote. Meanwhile, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill is weighing ways to block the fuel from her ports. Each step makes Russian diesel toxic for any sensible buyer. Each step keeps supply tight and prices high.

Coincidence? Perhaps. But it looks a lot like campaign strategy wearing the costume of oversight.

The legal question remains open. Democrats cite the Ending Importation of Russian Oil Act of 2022. The administration insists its licence stays within the law. Courts should settle that dispute, not threatening letters to bank chiefs.

The White House has called the campaign what it is. Spokeswoman Taylor Rogers accused Democrats of a ‘decade-long obsession with investigating President Trump’.

A tanker with no home

On Tuesday, Americans will choose who controls Congress. Whatever the result, this episode should trouble anyone who values fair play. Lawmakers should win arguments at the ballot box, not by spooking businesses. Until a court rules, families deserve every cheaper gallon the market can deliver.

Instead, a tanker sails on through the Atlantic with no buyer in sight. Washington’s Democrats seem happy to keep it that way.

 

Exit mobile version