Just after forcefully ending peaceful protests by Canadian truckers, PM Justin Trudeau has come up with another tool to turn Canada into a woke authoritarian state. Laura Mae Lindo, a member of the New Democratic Party (NDP) has tabled an “anti-racism” legislation in Ontario. Bill 67 or the Racial Equity in the Education System Act, is the name of the proposed legislation.
The dilemma over such a controversial rule is that it is based on a broad assumption that many Ontarians and school pupils are racists. Despite there being no substantial evidence to back these claims, these ideas are being forcefully shoved down the throat of Canadians.
Such slanted legislation offends every Canadian, let alone Ontarians. The planned anti-racism legislation actually aggravates the problem it is supposed to tackle. Also, keep in mind that this proposed legislation in Ontario could very well become Trudeau’s national policy in the future.
So, the bill, if it becomes legislation, will end up providing Trudeau with a new tool to turn Canada into a hell hole for white Canadians.
Bill C-67: An introduction
In the bill, “anti-racism” is described as “the policy of combating racism, such as anti-Indigenous racism, anti-Black racism, anti-Asian racism, antisemitism, and Islamophobia.” And “racism” is defined as “the use of socially constructed ideas of race to justify or support the notion that one race is superior to another, whether consciously or subconsciously.”
You see, the discriminatory definition acknowledges the racism against Jews, Blacks, Indigenous peoples, and Muslims only. You’re out of luck if you’re of a different race or skin tone. The law would also combat “subconscious racism,” or the perception that one race is superior to another.
Following are excerpts from the bill, and the specific usage of certain words in certain formulations tells us the malice in the intent:
(1.1) Every person who disrupts or attempts to disrupt the proceedings of a school or class through the use of racist language or by engaging in racist activities is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $200″
(5.2) If the Minister learns, upon conducting an investigation or otherwise, that a member of the Council does not have a proven commitment to racial equity in the post-secondary education sector, the Minister shall require that member to take anti-racism training within the following six months.
Guilty on the basis of perception
It would enable you to become guilty on the basis of mere perception. It asserts that one group is always dominating and incorrect, while the other is always the victim. The worst part is, if you hurt someone’s feelings, or offend them, you can be persecuted without any ability to defend yourself. A person is immediately guilty because of hurting someone’s feelings, even if the person did not mean to.
The articulation of the bill tells us that it is racially biased against people of specific races and skin tones. The bill, in the backdrop of undemocratic practices of the Trudeau government, paints a very grim picture of the lives of White people in Canada of the 21st century.
Also read: Horrified Trudeau steals $9 million from Canada’s ‘Freedom Convoy’
It was not long ago when the Canadian government was struggling to end the trucker protest by any means possible. These measures included seizing the money that was lawfully raised by Canada’s pro-freedom volunteers. The Trudeau government even used brutal force to disperse and punish the protestors. These protestors were even dubbed as domestic terrorists, by the so-called ‘liberal’ Canadian government.
Canada, where lawful protests can be labelled as illegal, and where the protestors can be termed as terrorists; is on its way to becoming a country where innocent citizens might be purged by the government for crimes that they have never committed. The country will turn into the perfect Orwellian state that Justin Trudeau is desperately trying to build.
It’s a provincial Bill, put forward by the Ontario NDP and passed with the support of the Conservative government of Doug Ford. It has nothing to do with Trudeau or the federal government. Does the person who wrote this understand even the most basic principles of how Canada’s political system works? In Canada, education is constitutionally within the jurisdiction of the provincial governments. The federal government had no say in the passing of this bill, but Doug Ford’s Conservative government passed it, and there is no love lost between him and Trudeau. Even if you didn’t know that education is provincial, a quick search reveals it was passed by the Ontario legislature. Criticize the bill and Trudeau all you want for their policies, but at least educate yourself on the basics of what level of government does what before expressing opinions; otherwise you just end up looking ignorant.
The bill has not yet been passed… a quick search reveals that as well. Otherwise, you are correct.
Jennifer, I believe you misunderstood the point the author was making.
The article/author stated ” this proposed legislation in Ontario could very well become Trudeau’s national policy in the future”, which means his overall racism policyapproach/dictatorship in Canada including censorship, etc..
As for Doug Ford, he will do anything to please the federal Liberals. Just as Jagmeet Singh agreed to the non-applicable Emergencies Act, his party is handing Trudeau this bill on a silver platter and Ford and his obedient servants are only too happy to agree.
Kinda like you.
This provincial bill would be a test run. You should be very very concerned about this being possibly applied federally. Trudeau’s government is running like a train unhinged. This is the future of all Canadians so get ready. 😥
What in Gods name have you been smoking,, man,, get your in ORDER, .. Jennifer, you could not be more further from truth what you write abouve..
I hate Trudeau and the communist party that’s running Canada, but it seems like bill c-67 has nothing to do with what you said. I don’t trust the government as far as I can throw it but the government description of the bill and all the parts within it are not even the same subject matter as what you said it was.
The deception lies masked within terms like “equity”.
As an Indigenous American who has Indigenous relatives in Canada, the “bill” should ONLY apply to people of Color due to the FACT that all others including, the JewISH, Asian, European or Latin are ALL Caucasian/Albions. Do a little research in biology. PEACE&LUV to the Children of the Prime Creator
You need to check your FACTS. Asian’s have no connection to Caucasians, they are a different racial category unto themselves. As an indigenous American, that would include you. Original Latin are of Asian decent as well and Latin American places have a lot of African mixed due to slavery, but they are still considered Latin. People of colour is not a race nor an ethnicity, it’s a pigeon holing bureaucratic term that holds no value.
Racism doesn’t get excluded if you are of a certain race, it’s still racism and bills like this are about control, nothing more.
Readers should listen to the Jordan Peterson podcast number 234 released on March 11, 2022. He and his guests discuss the bill, who is authored by, and how the language is used to mask its potential implications. It follows the critical race theory developed in the United States that is being fought so hard against by parents and others who are waking up to the realities of what it does to create division and inverse racism in American society.
Institutions that do not comply will have their funding withdrawn
Republics like Australia, NZ, UK, Canada, US, etc. are losing it dramatically. We could well end up in a Socialist World, with people traipsing off the the least socialist Countries; if they can get out, and if they can afford it. Any ideas other than Switzerland? I’m sure they don’t want a flood of other peoples..
I think the person that wrote this is mentally deranged, high in something and just stupid, is this article opinion based, or is this supposed to hold some substance somewhere?. We not racist but somehow recognizes he’ll for white people?, what?
Wake up and just read the bill, it’s as plain as the nose on your face. This is racism in its purest form, identifying certain groups for special treatment and vilifying and punishing other unnamed but obvious groups. Anti-rastist in itself is racist, if you are not a racist you should identify as being non-rasist, which simply means you see people as human beings, equal in all human terms. This bill is poison to our children, it will turn children against their friends, children against their parents. What about mixed race families, will the white mom or dad now become a white supremist in the eyes of the kids? This bill is a horrible mistake and will cause way more problems than what is supposedly intended to fix. Like all things from the radical left it is deliberately set up to create kaos. This garbage is coming from the American Marxist left, it’s called “Critical Race Theory” and has sneakily wormed its way into the education system there and now is trying the same tactic here. It must be stopped.
This country is falling apart it’s being destroyed piece by piece it’s sad to watch an apparently voting will do nothing now to change this mess! It’s like watching a car heading for a brick wall in slow motion.
The problem with this Bill is that it by no means defines what “anti-racism” or “racial equity” is. It assumes the reader knows what these terms mean. But for anyone that follows the woke Left and how they think, you quickly realize that these words are loaded with hidden meaning and ideology. They use virtuous sounding words to cloak their ideology. The Bill by no means describes how these terms will be applied and who gets to interpret them. Who gets to decide what is racist? In what contexts will these terms be applied? What about fake allegations? And as for racial equity, keep in mind that not all inequities are due to racism. What about cultural differences and even individual choices? I would be happy to address inequities only due to racism, but that can be open to interpretation and requires an open and honest discussion. Something which I doubt these ideological zealots are capable of. Essentially, this Bill’s intention is to allow govt and a certain ideologically driven group of people (woke Leftists) to be the sole judges and interpreters of what is and isn’t racist, according to their woke ideologies of course. If you will dare disagree with their methods, then you know what will happen.
Also, please explain to me what the virtue of “anti-racism” is, because I don’t understand it. What if some people are not racist? Is that not enough? Do they also have to be anti-racist? This term actively demands people to seek out racism, which ironically will create more racism. This is the problem with these social justice warrior crusaders and academics who are trying to turn social justice into an industry and beat everyone over the head with it. The social justice needs to come first before the issues. Because how else will you get to play social justice warrior and indulge in your vain self-gratification? Not denying that some degree of racism exists in Canada. But such efforts and ideologies will not help at all and will only make matters worse. This will demand racism to exist even in places where it doesn’t.
Bills like this are about control. Nothing more. Nothing less. Shameful if you ask me.
This article was making some good points up until it loses credibility with the idiot trucker support. They literally were holding the country at ransom. They were making it impossible for people to get to work on time by slowing traffic to a crawl, keeping people up at night with incessive honking, tying up emergency phone lines which yeah you can consider that domestic terrorism. All they really achieved was pissing off most of the country. That begin said yeah this bill is a slippery and scary slope. It leaves a lot to interpretation possible by the wrong people who have biases themselves. It will be like the internet policing real world occurrences. This is political correctness over stepping it’s bounds and secular censorship. one time it was the conservative religious narrative that books needed to be burned and “devil” music censored, in some cases it still is but now it’s liberals and social parties wanting everything policed and I can’t stand by them anymore. My mom had said black gangs are big trouble in Toronto, a comment like that can be interrupted by someone else as racist even if only on a subconscious level? She would possibly be fined that 200 dollars in a school setting. That’s fucking scary. Also what age are you fining people this money and 200 dollars is a lot of money to someone in minimum wage or going to school while working minor part time. This is insane. We are all human beings capable or errors, biases and lapses in judgement. I’m sure the MPs that put this bill forward are guilty of the same but it’s doubtful they will hold themselves accountable. Finally to those few, no the author wasn’t making this bill up, everything he said is in the bill although his interpretation of it can be debated. The 200 dollars thing is in there exactly as stated. I’ve read a lot of the bill myself. While I do think that schools should teach about racism and improve the understanding about it, they should not go as far to literally police it by charging people money or any insane breach of boundary like it. We are going to have a shit ton of problems in the future with people policing people. Biases policing biases. Some thinking they have superior morals but are guilty of the same bad behavior and accusations built around wrongful assumptions. Just like the internet.
The trucker rally was deemed legal and it was not a blockade. The police were making blockades not the trucks and telling the trucks where to go and where not to go. There were no arrests made. But some veterans were beaten up at the War Memorial and dumped out in the country late at night in -25 degrees. Also due to covid almost all govt workers worked from home and many businesses went under in Ottawa since covid started.