The Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement (CUFTA) is becoming a bone of contention in Canada now. As the name itself suggests, it represents a proposed trade pact aimed at fostering enhanced economic collaboration between Canada and Ukraine. Its primary objective is to streamline and facilitate the movement of goods and services between the two nations. Through this agreement, both countries seek to eliminate or reduce tariffs on various traded products, enabling smoother trade relations.
Trudeau’s government has actively pursued the modernization and expansion of this trade agreement.
But, much to Trudeau’s concerns, the agreement fizzled out.
Justin Trudeau is now blaming MAGA conservatives and Tucker Carlson for the collapse of the proposed Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Deal. Despite Canada’s existing aid and military support for Ukraine, Trudeau sought another trade agreement. Some question the urgency of such a deal considering Ukraine’s current turmoil. Behind the scenes, grassroots conservatives are concerned about the substantial aid sent to Ukraine. Here Kyiv is teetering on the brink of disaster and collapse and do you really think Ukraine is worried about the Free Trade Agreement with Canada? Probably not.
Read More: Once BFFs, chocolate boys Zelensky and Trudeau do not talk to each other now
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre defended his party’s collective rejection of the bill aiming to amend the Canada-Ukraine Free Trade Agreement due to concerns about carbon tax references. This move has left the liberals gobsmacked, who view it as a refusal to assist a country in the midst of rebuilding efforts after war.
During a caucus meeting, Poilievre clarified that while his party opposes free trade with Ukraine, their specific concern was about potential implications of a carbon tax on Ukraine.
The Liberals, however, interpret the Conservatives’ stance as a lack of support for a nation dealing with post-war reconstruction.
In the initial vote on Tuesday, Conservative MPs unanimously voted against advancing the legislation. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau criticized his main political opponent on the right, suggesting that the Conservatives, under the influence of Donald Trump, were abandoning Ukraine.
Join us on Telegram: https://t.me/tfiglobal
During the preliminary vote, all 109 Conservative lawmakers in the House of Commons opposed the updated legislation for the free trade agreement between Canada and Ukraine, while other parties unanimously supported it.
Many Canadians are increasingly realizing that Ukraine’s leaders, including President Zelensky and high-level politicians, might be channeling funds into private accounts, anticipating a swift departure from the country post-war. With the substantial aid received from Canada, NATO countries, primarily the United States, lacking accountability measures, the proposed free trade agreement holds little significance. Ukraine’s current state indicates an imminent collapse rather than the capacity to uphold a Free Trade Agreement (FTA).
Critics argue that despite Trudeau’s assertion of Canadian unity in supporting Ukraine, the reality is bleak. The country’s dire situation raises doubts about the effectiveness of continued solidarity. Some question the sustainability of support until either all Ukrainian lives are lost in battle or until there’s a complete depletion of military resources in Canada. The growing resistance from conservatives signals a shift, challenging the notion of perpetually offering treaties and billions in aid to Ukraine.
Moreover, recent videos from the Polish border depict instances where Polish truckers are obstructing the flow of goods into Ukraine. One viral video showcased luxury cars being halted at the border, raising questions among Polish observers. They questioned why a corridor supposedly meant for sending arms and weaponry to aid Ukraine’s critical situation was instead allowing luxury car shipments. This situation has fueled skepticism among observers who wonder about the necessity of additional aid considering the substantial support already provided by Canada and the United States in the form of billions of dollars and weaponry.
Read More: New Canada: Lighting Ukraine while Canada goes dark
Trudeau’s statement emphasizes the shift in Canadian Conservative attitudes towards Ukraine. He attributes this change to the influence of right-wing American MAGA ideology, alleging that this ideology has prompted Canadian Conservatives, once staunch supporters of Ukraine, to withdraw support when it’s most needed. Trudeau’s remarks echo sentiments similar to those in the handbook of U.S. President Biden, denouncing MAGA extremism and implicating figures like Tucker Carlson in Ukraine’s hour of need.
Trudeau’s recent tactics seem to reflect a desperate bid to maintain both his position as Prime Minister and leader of the Liberal Party. Within his caucus, there’s a growing dissent, with many MPs predicting electoral devastation if Trudeau continues in his current role. Hence, Trudeau is invoking the MAGA Boogeyman, a tactic he’s employed intermittently. For the woke left and ardent Trudeau supporters in Canada, MAGA and Donald Trump represent the epitome of evil. Now, Tucker Carlson seems to have joined this group of supposedly nefarious figures.
The recent collaboration between Kingston liberal MP Mark Gerretsen and the government house leader sought to highlight Tucker Carlson’s alleged influence on the Conservative Party of Canada, insinuating his encouragement for Canadians to turn their backs on Ukraine. This development has led to calls within the liberal caucus to even bar his participation in an upcoming event with Danielle Smith in Alberta. The Liberal party’s apparent apprehension about Tucker Carlson’s visit and their tendency to attribute unsavory events to MAGA Republicans and Trump illustrate a politics driven by desperation.
Watch More:
https://youtu.be/5LST6EvxVfc?si=pTtD_trnTSV6IE1N
