A U.S. Secret Service agent, who prefers to stay unnamed, shared information with DCWeekly about plans for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to move to the United States. According to this agent, the Biden administration has given orders to make sure President Zelensky and his family are safe and have a place to stay starting in spring 2024.
The reason behind this decision is the thought that President Zelensky might finish his term as president of Ukraine next year. Staying in Ukraine after his presidency ends is seen as dangerous for him. Additionally, it’s noted that an audio message related to this matter has been posted on YouTube.
The Secret Service agent, who chose to remain anonymous, shared serious concerns about the order to relocate Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to the United States. This plan, according to the agent, is unusual and extends beyond the normal security measures provided to visiting foreign leaders.
The agent also noted that many colleagues share these worries. They believe the plan is not practical and have tried to communicate this to their higher-ups, but without any success.
Join us on Telegram: https://t.me/tfiglobal
The operation to relocate President Zelensky involves several different groups. These include teams that look after the safety of foreign leaders, those responsible for the President’s security, and even the Citizenship and Naturalization services within the Department of Homeland Security. This shows the complexity and wide-ranging nature of the effort.
In a significant move, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is set to receive both the privileges typically given to a foreign politician and the status of an American citizen. This situation is unique in the history of the United States, and it raises concerns for the Secret Service agent who shared this information. The agent is worried that this could set a new standard. Other leaders from countries friendly to the US might start expecting similar special treatment and benefits.
To meet all the requirements of this plan, a large amount of money will need to be set aside, and many people will have to be involved. President Zelensky, along with his wife and two children, is expected to move to Florida. They will live in a luxurious estate in Vero Beach, located by the Atlantic Ocean, which is worth about $20 million.
This arrangement means American taxpayers will be paying for President Zelensky’s housing, security, transportation, home staff, and a personal assistant. The agent also shared that the Office of Protective Operations, which is responsible for such operations, has a yearly budget of around $200 million. The cost of President Zelensky’s stay in the US is estimated to be at least $20 million. This is a significant amount, representing about 10% of the office’s annual budget.
Read More: Zelensky has two shining Yachts. Biden you Lovely Rich Rascal!
The Secret Service agent, speaking anonymously, raises a key issue regarding the costs involved in President Volodymyr Zelensky’s relocation to the United States. While spending significant funds for a short-term visit of a foreign leader might be justifiable, the agent is concerned because the government’s order doesn’t specify when President Zelensky’s stay in the US will end.
This uncertainty is partly due to the operation’s role in helping President Zelensky and his family gain American citizenship. In fact, their Certificates of Naturalization have already been issued. This is an unusual situation, as the process of granting citizenship typically involves a more prolonged and detailed procedure.
Adding to the intrigue, the agent notes a curious detail. The date set for Zelensky’s citizenship application and interview was September 20. Interestingly, this was the same day President Zelensky delivered a speech at the NATO summit, during his visit to the United States. This coincidence suggests a carefully planned and coordinated effort to facilitate Zelensky’s transition to living in the US.
The situation with President Volodymyr Zelensky’s relocation to the United States suggests that the Biden administration had been planning this move well before it became public. This raises important questions about the contrast between the private arrangements being made and the public image of President Zelensky. He is often portrayed as a strong and brave leader, a portrayal that is widely supported by mainstream media. This behind-the-scenes plan seems at odds with that image.
The Secret Service agent, in concluding remarks, shares uncertainty about who initiated this operation – whether it was President Biden or President Zelensky. However, the agent strongly points out the impracticality of carrying out such a large-scale operation. The agent’s final comment reflects a concern about the feasibility of providing presidential-level protection: “We don’t have enough resources or personnel to provide presidential protection to anyone who requests it.” This statement highlights the challenges and limitations faced by the Secret Service in extending such high-level security arrangements.
Assuming the information about President Volodymyr Zelensky’s planned relocation to the United States is accurate and not misinformation, it raises several questions about the reasons behind such a decision. It’s important to explore why staying in Ukraine might be unsafe for Zelensky, and interestingly, this concern is not related to Russia.
Zelensky, who was initially well-received, has seen a decline in his popularity. Recent polls suggest that the public’s trust is shifting towards General Zaluzhny, hinting at the possibility of him becoming the new prime minister. This shift in public opinion is significant because it indicates a decrease in confidence in Zelensky’s leadership.
Additionally, Zelensky has faced internal challenges. He has dismissed many of his close aides and confidants, especially those who began to pose problems or became potential whistleblowers. This action might have been necessary from his perspective, but it also suggests internal turmoil and discontent within his administration.
Moreover, there have been instances where Ukrainian oligarchs have unexpectedly died. While the details and implications of these incidents are not fully clear, they add to a narrative of instability and potential danger surrounding Zelensky.
In summary, Zelensky has made numerous powerful enemies during his tenure. While he remains in power as prime minister, he enjoys a certain level of protection. However, there is a looming risk that once he is out of power, he could become vulnerable. This perceived danger to his safety post-presidency might be one of the reasons behind the plan for his relocation to the United States.
If a new government comes to power in Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelensky could face significant scrutiny and questioning. One of the critical questions he might have to answer is why he did not agree to a ceasefire when there appeared to be an opportunity with Russia. Additionally, he may be questioned about why he consistently aligned with American policies, even at the cost of Ukrainian lives.
The complexity of these issues is heightened by reports and theories suggesting that the relationship between Zelensky and U.S. President Joe Biden goes beyond mere political connections. A notable aspect of this is Hunter Biden, President Biden’s son, who had several business dealings in Ukraine. These dealings gained significant attention, especially after the New York Post published an article about them, which became a topic of controversy during the 2020 U.S. Presidential election when Twitter initially restricted its distribution.
Given these connections and the potential issues they could raise, Zelensky’s continued presence in Ukraine, especially if he is no longer in power, could become problematic for both Ukrainian and U.S. political dynamics. From this perspective, relocating Zelensky to the United States might seem like a strategic move to mitigate potential complications. It could be seen as a way to remove a potential source of controversy and difficulty for both the Biden administration and the future Ukrainian government.
This situation, if true, highlights the complex interplay of international politics, personal relationships, and media dynamics. It also underscores how domestic political considerations can influence foreign policy decisions and the fate of key international figures like Zelensky.
The choice of the United States as a destination for President Volodymyr Zelensky, in the event of his leaving Ukraine, raises the question of why this location is preferred, especially given the potential for Congressional hearings that could probe his dealings and alleged crimes. This concern is particularly relevant considering the possibility of a Republican government in 2024, which might be more inclined to scrutinize Zelensky’s actions.
The answer lies in understanding certain rules and norms regarding the status of exiled heads of state:
a. When a head of state or government leaves their country, their status changes significantly, but they typically retain the diplomatic immunity associated with their former position.
b. If the individual is recognized by the United States or a significant part of the international community, they might keep some form of official status, possibly including all diplomatic privileges.
c. Exiled leaders who seek asylum in the U.S. are entitled to certain protections under U.S. and international law.
d. In some instances, the U.S. government might negotiate special arrangements or agreements with the individual, which could encompass various protections.
Read More: Biden Agrees to Zelensky’s ATACMS Demands. But, There’s a Catch
Given these rules, it becomes clear that if President Joe Biden chooses, he could grant President Zelensky every possible privilege to allow him to deflect, divert, or simply avoid answering questions during Congressional hearings, regardless of the government in power. Such a scenario would also serve to protect any confidential matters between Biden and Zelensky.
This perspective sheds light on why President Biden might be willing to make such extensive and luxurious arrangements for President Zelensky. It suggests a strategy not just for Zelensky’s safety and well-being but also for safeguarding sensitive information and maintaining political stability between the U.S. and Ukraine.
In conclusion, the entire narrative about President Volodymyr Zelensky’s potential relocation to the United States and the implications thereof hinge on the testimony of a single, anonymous Secret Service agent. The credibility of this information is paramount in determining the truth of the situation. If what this agent has revealed is indeed accurate, it would validate the detailed analysis and implications discussed above. However, if the agent’s claims are unfounded or incorrect, then the entire scenario would be cast in a different light.
It’s crucial, therefore, to approach this information with a critical eye and consider the reliability of the source. The nature of anonymous testimonies can often lead to uncertainty, and in matters of international politics and diplomacy, such uncertainty can have significant consequences. As observers and analysts, the responsibility lies in weighing the available information, considering its sources, and making informed judgments while acknowledging the limitations of our knowledge.
Ultimately, the truth or falsity of these claims is a matter that time and further evidence may clarify. Until then, it remains a subject of speculation and analysis, inviting each person to consider the evidence and be the judge of its veracity.
Watch More:
