TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Trump Asked Zelenskyy if Ukraine Could Strike Moscow and St. Petersburg with U.S. Weapons

This escalation is mirrored by Trump’s increasing frustration with Putin.

Rashi Randev by Rashi Randev
July 16, 2025
in Geopolitics
Trump Asked Zelenskyy if Ukraine Could Strike Moscow and St. Petersburg with U.S. Weapons (NK News)

Trump Asked Zelenskyy if Ukraine Could Strike Moscow and St. Petersburg with U.S. Weapons

Share on FacebookShare on X

Also Read

Trump Says Putin Won’t Meet Zelenskyy ‘Because He Doesn’t Like Him’. How Will Peace Prevail In Ukraine?

‘Blackmail and Explosions Won’t Help’ Hungary’s PM Viktor Orbán Warns Zelenskyy Over Striking Druzhba Pipeline

Trump says ‘China has to give us Magnets (Rare Earth Minerals), If they don’t, then we’ll have to charge them massive tariffs—maybe 200 percent or something’. How Will Beijing Respond?

Marking a significant departure from his previous non-interventionist approach, U.S. President Donald Trump is reported to have asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy whether Ukraine could launch strikes deep within Russian territory, including Moscow and St. Petersburg, if supplied with American long-range weapons.

This exchange, first reported by the Financial Times and corroborated by multiple sources, comes at a pivotal moment in the Russo-Ukrainian conflict, reflecting mounting Western frustration with Russia’s intransigence and a changing strategic outlook in Washington.

A Shift from Non-Interventionism?

The July 4 phone call between Trump and Zelenskyy occurred immediately after a separate and reportedly “bad” conversation Trump had with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Sources briefed on the exchange describe how Trump bluntly asked, “Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? Can you hit St Petersburg too?” Zelenskyy responded, “Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons”.

Previously, Washington had urged Kyiv to avoid deep strikes into Russian territory, cautioning against the use of Western weapons for such purposes. Yet, Ukraine has ramped up domestic drone and missile attacks behind Russian lines, including high-profile operations against Russian strategic bombers (“Operation Spiderweb”).

Trump’s comments were followed by a meeting between U.S. officials and Zelenskyy in Rome, where a list of potential long-range weapon systems, such as the Tomahawk cruise missile and ATACMS, was discussed.

Due to a freeze on direct U.S. military aid, the transfer of such systems would likely require third-party sales through European allies. Trump later announced additional Patriot air defense missiles for Ukraine but did not confirm approval of longer-range strike systems.

This escalation is mirrored by Trump’s increasing frustration with Putin. Early in his new term, Trump had boasted about his rapport with Putin and claimed he could end the war in “24 hours.”

However, after failed ceasefire negotiations and what he described as disappointing talks, Trump began directly criticizing the Russian leader. He has now threatened harsh 100% tariffs or secondary sanctions on countries buying Russian oil if Moscow does not agree to peace within 50 days.

China’s Strategic Calculations, NATO, and the Taiwan Factor

China has carefully monitored the evolving U.S. stance on the Ukraine conflict, viewing Washington’s discussions of providing advanced weaponry and supporting deep strikes as a catalyst for escalating global tensions.

Chinese officials have repeatedly called for restraint and renewed dialogue, warning that stepped-up Western support for Kyiv, particularly in the form of long-range attack capabilities, not only risks destabilizing Europe but also threatens to draw NATO into a broader confrontation with Russia.

From Beijing’s perspective, such U.S. moves undermine its persistent appeals for a negotiated settlement and run counter to the principle that “external actors must not encourage escalation or fuel the fighting.” At the same time, Beijing’s criticism serves to project itself as a responsible global power and bolster its diplomatic ties with Moscow, while retaining its leverage as a potential mediator in the conflict.

Importantly, China also draws a parallel with the situation in the Asia-Pacific, particularly over Taiwan. Chinese leaders closely watch how NATO and the U.S. respond to Russia’s war in Ukraine, seeing clear implications for any future Taiwan crisis.

Beijing fears that precedent-setting Western intervention in Ukraine could embolden separatist forces in Taiwan and spur calls for increased U.S. and NATO security commitments in East Asia.

Chinese analysts openly warn that continued Western military support for Ukraine may not only push China closer toward Russia, politically, economically, and diplomatically, but could also compel Beijing to upgrade its military posture around Taiwan in response to perceived parallels in foreign interference.

Ultimately, China’s response to the Ukraine crisis is shaped by its desire to counterbalance NATO and the U.S. in both Europe and the Asia-Pacific, recalibrate its strategic partnerships, and reinforce calls for dialogue over confrontation, whether in Kyiv, Moscow, or Taipei. Escalating tensions in Ukraine thus serve as a warning sign for both regions, with Beijing positioning itself as a stabilizing force against what it frames as U.S.-led destabilization.

The Risks and Ambiguity of Trump’s Ukraine Strategy

Trump’s exchange with Zelenskyy, whether a calculated signal, a rhetorical flourish, or a genuine policy pivot, adds significant ambiguity to U.S. strategy. Raising the prospect of Ukrainian strikes on Moscow or St. Petersburg carries enormous risks:

It forces Russia to contemplate nuclear scenarios or escalate retaliation.

It may fray Western unity, exposing rifts both within NATO and between the U.S. and its allies.

It calls into question the U.S. commitment to escalation management and adherence to the distinction between battlefield and civilian targets.

At the same time, credible threats can, in theory, pressure Moscow towards negotiations—yet they rely on delicate messaging and operational control, both of which may be lacking with such publicly aired hypotheticals.

Also Read: Russia’s Biggest 728-drone and Hypersonic Missiles Attack on Ukraine:  Trump Pledges Weapons Aid, Criticizes Putin.

Trump’s suggestive queries mark a dramatic and highly controversial moment in U.S. foreign policy. Despite clarifications that he is “merely asking questions,” the very act of floating such scenarios with Ukraine’s leader sends potent signals to Moscow, NATO, and the world. As China amplifies its calls for de-escalation, global tensions risk rising even further.

Tags: #VolodymyrZelenskyBeijingDoald TrumpNATOPutinTaiwan
ShareTweetSend
Rashi Randev

Rashi Randev

Also Read

Trump claims he can “destroy China but is instead choosing to induct 600,000 new Chinese students in US”, as he declares that EU Leaders call him the “President of Europe”

Trump claims he can “destroy China but is instead choosing to induct 600,000 new Chinese students in US”, as he declares that EU Leaders call him the “President of Europe”

August 26, 2025
Trump called Modi four times in recent week, but Modi didn't pick call- FAZ

Trump called Modi four times, but Modi didn’t pick call- German media FAZ claims. India-US strategic fallout?

August 26, 2025
Trump Says Putin Won't Meet Zelenskyy 'Because He Doesn't Like Him'. How Will Peace Prevail In Ukraine?

Trump Says Putin Won’t Meet Zelenskyy ‘Because He Doesn’t Like Him’. How Will Peace Prevail In Ukraine?

August 26, 2025
Trump’s 50% Tariffs on India Take Effect Tomorrow: Why New Delhi Refuses to Bow to US Pressure

Trump’s new 50% Tariffs on India for buying Russian Oil but Modi Refuses to Bow to US Pressure. Strategic Autonomy or BRICS Solidarity? 

August 26, 2025
Trump says ‘China has to give us Magnets (Rare Earth Minerals), If they don’t, then we’ll have to charge them massive tariffs—maybe 200 percent or something’. How Will Beijing Respond?

Trump says ‘China has to give us Magnets (Rare Earth Minerals), If they don’t, then we’ll have to charge them massive tariffs—maybe 200 percent or something’. How Will Beijing Respond?

August 26, 2025
Why Russia-Ukraine Conflict may again Escalate, even After the Peace Deal, Once Trump’s Presidency Ends? 

Why Russia-Ukraine war 2.0 may start again even after the Peace Deal, when Trump’s Presidency Ends? 

August 26, 2025
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.