Require online platforms identify, remove and report to law enforcement content that may belong to five already illegal categories of speech:
- Sexualized content involving children;
- Non-consensual sharing of sexual images;
- Hate speech;
- Incitement to violence, against persons or property;
- Incitement to terrorism.
Upon which we interject with a break-down of how PM Justin Trudeau’s quasi-communist government roll. Presenting a list of benevolent social undertakings, the Liberal strategists slip in a covert goal they hope will be misunderstood by the public.
Public incitement of hatred:
319(1) Every one who, by communicating statements in any public place, incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.
So much for “sunny ways” Canada, as expressed by PM Trudeau upon seizure of Canadian society in late 2015.
The system grants the Digital Commissioner unprecedented powers with minimal restriction on their use, including:
“The right to conduct its hearings on content takedowns in secret.”
Let’s hear it for KGB–time in Canada. What a wonderful world of communist crackdowns we are to experience by way of government “protection of general society.”
An non-elected Liberal government bureaucrat will be placed in charge of a policy to police the Canadian internet. Breaches will be what government say they are. Punitive damages await those who violate the mandates.
All of which sounds desperately in-line with internet censorship in communist China:
In December, 2015, China’s President Xi Jinping pronounced that “the Chinese internet would be a world unto itself, with its content closely monitored and managed by the Communist party.”
Is, or is this not, the bottom line within the Liberal’s proposal for free speech suppression on the internet? Is it not true that PM Justin Trudeau has publicly expressed his endorsement Chinese-style communism?
“Giving the regulator broad power to order website blocking of sites that host both legal and illegal speech is a disproportionate and dangerous remedy that has previously only been common in authoritarian states like Russia and China, not in democratic states.”
Such a structure may not exist in so-called “democratic states.” But it could exist within a western democracy that is being systemically transitioned to a communist state.
Is this the true state-of-affairs in Justin Trudeau’s “no core identity” Canada? Incrementally, our nation’s core institutions are being systemically transferred to nascent communist entities.
Government most of all, followed by a purchase by the Liberals of mainstream Canadian media. To return revenues and market-share taken away by the rise of social media– the Canadian internet is about to fall under neo-communist control.
Canadian academia, seduced over the decades by anti-Canadian Marxist propaganda, fell under the communist spell decades ago. With the advent of the Covid pandemic– another China-derived phenomenon, health care in our country has made the neo-communist transition. Trudeau’s Euthanasia policies being indicative of the very concept.
We witness the seduction of our society. That is, those who make the effort to transcend Liberal-Media propaganda campaigns.
“In the years before Xi became president in 2012, the internet had begun to afford the Chinese people an unprecedented level of transparency and power to communicate. Popular bloggers, some of whom advocated bold social and political reforms, commanded tens of millions of followers.”
In the years before Justin Trudeau became prime minister, Canadians were afforded a fair and reasonable degree of autonomy regarding communication on the internet.
In 2015, Justin Trudeau became prime minister, thus beginning Canada’s slide from freedom and democracy toward a neo-communist nation-state.