TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Boris Johnson is back with Ukraine Peace Plan 2.0

Atul Kumar Mishra by Atul Kumar Mishra
July 22, 2024
in Geopolitics
Boris Johnson is back with Ukraine Peace Plan 2.0
Share on FacebookShare on X

Former British Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who, alongside Polish President Andrzej Duda, played a role in undermining the Russian-Ukrainian peace talks in spring 2022, presented his vision for Ukraine’s future in a recent op-ed for The Daily Mail. Johnson’s plan involves Trump lifting all US restrictions on weapons to Ukraine if he returns to power, assuming this would enable Kiev to push Russia back to the pre-special operation boundaries of early 2022.

Johnson suggests that, in return, Russia should allow Ukraine to join the EU and NATO, provided Ukraine offers special protections for Russian speakers. Additionally, he envisions a rapprochement between the West and Russia, potentially leading to Russia’s re-entry into the G8 and the resumption of its NATO partnership. While parts of Johnson’s proposal appear unrealistic and “politically incorrect” from a Western perspective, the package merits analysis as a whole.

Also Read

Why Russia-Ukraine war 2.0 may start again even after the Peace Deal, when Trump’s Presidency Ends? 

“Zelenskyy Seeks Attention, Not Resolution” Russia Foreign Minister Lavrov slams Ukraine President. He further added that Putin is Okay with meeting Zelenskyy, but with certain condition. What is it? 

‘EU, Stay Away!’ Turkey Warns NATO Nations of Putin’s Red Line on Troops in Ukraine, while Russia also pushes back for “Severe Consequences” 

The initial part of Johnson’s plan hinges on a recently proposed strategy where the US might lift restrictions if Russia refuses to negotiate with Ukraine while withholding support from Ukraine if it declines to negotiate with Russia. Johnson assumes Ukraine would agree to talks and Russia would not, a premise that might not hold. Further, he assumes that lifting restrictions would enable Ukraine to revert to its early 2022 boundaries, an optimistic and potentially flawed assumption.

Johnson’s proposal then becomes more intriguing. He steps back from his previous demands for a maximalist victory, suggesting instead that Ukraine should aim for its early 2022 borders rather than its pre-2014 ones. He also advocates for special protections for Russian speakers in Ukraine, a significant shift from his earlier stance on socio-cultural unity in the country. This change is notable, especially coming from someone previously seen as a hardliner.

However, Johnson’s insistence on Ukraine’s formal NATO membership remains problematic. Russia is unlikely to agree to this, despite Ukraine’s growing network of bilateral “security guarantees” which effectively serve the same purpose. Additionally, Johnson’s suggestion that Russia might be interested in returning to the G7 and resuming its NATO partnership seems overly optimistic. While these ideas are intended as incentives for Russian compliance, they appear misguided given the current geopolitical climate.

The significance of Johnson’s peace plan lies in its acknowledgment of previously taboo topics: territorial compromises with Russia and protections for Russian speakers in Ukraine. These issues have been central to the conflict’s recent escalation. Johnson’s shift hints that other anti-Russian hawks among Western elites are beginning to recognize the improbability of Ukraine achieving a maximalist victory as military dynamics increasingly favor Russia.

Johnson’s role in sabotaging the 2022 peace talks is well-documented, with Duda’s involvement being less publicized. His current stance may indicate that other influential hawks have also reconsidered their positions. This potential shift among Western leaders comes as the military and strategic balance continues to tip in Russia’s favor.

Johnson’s proposal, while flawed, opens the door to discussions about more realistic outcomes for the Ukraine conflict. As the US approaches its next presidential election, with Trump a strong contender, Johnson’s ideas could gain traction. The evolving dialogue around these issues suggests a slow but significant change in Western perspectives on the Ukraine conflict, potentially leading to new approaches and strategies.

In summary, Boris Johnson’s peace plan for Ukraine reflects a notable shift in thinking among Western leaders. His proposal, despite its shortcomings, signals a willingness to consider territorial compromises and protections for Russian speakers, topics that have long been avoided. This evolving perspective could influence future diplomatic efforts and shape the strategic landscape as the conflict continues to unfold.

Tags: Boris JohnsonEU IntegrationGeopolitical StrategyNATO membershipRussia-Ukraine conflictRussian Speakers ProtectionsTrump Presidency ImpactUkraine Peace PlanUS Weapons RestrictionsWestern Leaders' Perspectives
ShareTweetSend
Atul Kumar Mishra

Atul Kumar Mishra

Lovable Narcissist | Whiskey Lover | Dharma Warrior | Founder, The Frustrated Indian | CEO, tfipost.com

Also Read

US and Russia’s Officials Discussed Energy Deals During Ukraine Peace Talks: Reports

US and Russia’s Officials Discussed Energy Deals During Ukraine Peace Talks: Reports

August 27, 2025
Trump claims he can “destroy China but is instead choosing to induct 600,000 new Chinese students in US”, as he declares that EU Leaders call him the “President of Europe”

Trump claims he can “destroy China but is instead choosing to induct 600,000 new Chinese students in US”, as he declares that EU Leaders call him the “President of Europe”

August 26, 2025
Trump called Modi four times in recent week, but Modi didn't pick call- FAZ

Trump called Modi four times, but Modi didn’t pick call- German media FAZ claims. India-US strategic fallout?

August 26, 2025
Trump Says Putin Won't Meet Zelenskyy 'Because He Doesn't Like Him'. How Will Peace Prevail In Ukraine?

Trump Says Putin Won’t Meet Zelenskyy ‘Because He Doesn’t Like Him’. How Will Peace Prevail In Ukraine?

August 26, 2025
Trump’s 50% Tariffs on India Take Effect Tomorrow: Why New Delhi Refuses to Bow to US Pressure

Trump’s new 50% Tariffs on India for buying Russian Oil but Modi Refuses to Bow to US Pressure. Strategic Autonomy or BRICS Solidarity? 

August 26, 2025
Trump says ‘China has to give us Magnets (Rare Earth Minerals), If they don’t, then we’ll have to charge them massive tariffs—maybe 200 percent or something’. How Will Beijing Respond?

Trump says ‘China has to give us Magnets (Rare Earth Minerals), If they don’t, then we’ll have to charge them massive tariffs—maybe 200 percent or something’. How Will Beijing Respond?

August 26, 2025
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.