TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Pfizer and Moderna could actually be having negative efficacy: That means more likelihood of getting Covid

Vikrant Thardak by Vikrant Thardak
December 26, 2021
in Americas
Efficacy, Pfizer, Moderna, vaccines
Share on FacebookShare on X

Vaccines protect you against diseases — they boost your immunity and help curb the spread of deadly pandemics, unless and until you are getting yourself inoculated with faulty jabs.

Negative efficacy registered after two doses of Pfizer and Moderna

A study released by medRxiv, which is yet to be certified by peer review, recently indicated that two shots of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines offer no protection against the Omicron variant at all. Instead, two shots of these vaccines may register negative efficacy past three months of getting the second dose.

Also Read

How US vs Russia, China clash is damaging global cybersecurity?

IMF and the West once again come out in support of terrorism, give Pakistan $2.4 bn aid

Why U.S. Should Not Sell Its Military Technology to Pakistan?

As the table suggests, people vaccinated with two doses of Pfizer vaccine maybe 76.5% more likely to catch Covid-19 than those still unvaccinated. The figure stands at 39.3% for those inoculated with two doses of the Moderna vaccine.

This uncertified study shows that people are better off remaining unvaccinated than being inoculated with these vaccines in long run (more than three months).

Also read: ‘Pfizer paid experts to lie,’ Pfizer funded a concerted hit job on AstraZeneca’s vaccine and got caught

Mind the fact that this data is specifically registered for vaccine efficacy against the Omicron variant; the vaccine’s efficacy against the Delta variant still stood at above 50% level even after three months of getting the second jab.

The same study also reveals that a third “booster” shot may yield positive efficacy results above 50% level against both variants. All in all, this study conveniently concludes that getting a booster shot is necessary for maintaining vaccine efficacy at desired levels. However, it missed out on an important point. It didn’t touch upon the fact that this negative efficacy episode may repeat itself after 3 to 5 months from now.

MedRxiv study in conformity with an Israeli study

The study by medRxiv is not the only study that questions Pfizer’s efficacy. An Israeli study recently published in Nature Communications had also shown a decline in antibody levels and immune system compounds after four to six months. The study had revealed that people jabbed with Pfizer vaccines in January had a 51% increased chance of contracting the virus in July compared to those who were vaccinated in March or April.

Also read: ‘Pfizer falsified data,’ British Medical Journal reveals the biggest vaccine scam ever

In November, several allegations concerning data reporting were levelled against Pfizer. As per the British Medical Journal, Brook Jackson, who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group, alleged that the Pfizer company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was also slow in responding to the adverse incidents reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial.

FDA under fire for Pfizer approval

But it is not just the vaccine maker that is now finding itself faring in hot waters; the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of the USA is also facing the same stumbling block, which has lately come under extensive scrutiny for giving its approval to the vaccine despite glaring discrepancies.

The FDA is now facing a lawsuit filed by Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT), a group of doctors and scientists who were earlier denied access to the documents in its possession, tied to the approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

In response, the FDA told a federal judge on November 15, that it had possession of 329,000 pages and that it would be able to release a maximum of 500 pages per month after thorough perusing and redaction. At that rate, FDA will require 55 years to fully release the documents in question.

Also read: FDA took 108 days to approve Pfizer vaccine but wants 55 Years to explain how

Pfizer is also accused of harbouring covert ties with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). All in all, there is no scarcity of reasons why this company must be exposed to a thorough investigation by the federal agencies.

Even phasing out Pfizer and Moderna vaccines for better vaccines from India, like India-made Covaxin, must be considered. The iniquitous alliance of Big Pharma and the deep state has so far prevented Indian vaccine makers from accessing the American markets. It is high time that Americans press their government to get easy and early access to advanced Indian vaccines.

Tags: ChinaCoronaviruscovaxinCOVID-19IndiaModernaOmicron variantPandemicPfizerUSA
ShareTweetSend
Vikrant Thardak

Vikrant Thardak

I see truth

Also Read

Trump executive order to ban Gear of function research linked to covid-19

Trump Bans Gain-of-Function Research linked to Covid-19

May 7, 2025
Defense Secretary Hegseth Orders Major Cuts to US Military’s Top Ranks

Defense Secretary Hegseth Orders Major Cuts to US Military’s Top Ranks

May 6, 2025
Trump announces 100% tariff on non-US Movies

Trump announces 100% tariff on non-US movies, citing threat to National Security

May 6, 2025
Polls, Protests, and Power: Canada Election Drama Unfolds

Canada goes to polls: Carney Leads? Or will Poilievre make up ground

April 28, 2025
Musk about to leave DOGE. What lies ahead?

Musk to leave DOGE? Tesla in trouble?

April 25, 2025
Trump vs Harvard: University sues US President for cutting 2 billion dollar funds

Trump vs Harvard: University sues US President for cutting 2 billion dollar funds

April 22, 2025
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

- Select Visibility -

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Indo-Pacific
    • Americas
    • Canada
    • Indian Subcontinent
    • West Asia
    • Europe
    • Africa
    • The Caribbean
    TFIPOST English
    TFIPOST हिन्दी

    ©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

    This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.