TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIGlobal
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
No Result
View All Result
TFIGlobal
TFIGlobal
No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean

Australia couldn’t kick China out of the Darwin port, so it’s killing the port altogether

TFIGLOBAL News Desk by TFIGLOBAL News Desk
April 3, 2022
in China, Geopolitics, Global Issues
Australia couldn’t kick China out of the Darwin port, so it’s killing the port altogether
Share on FacebookShare on X

When China hawks like Australian PM Scott Morrison and former US President Donald Trump hadn’t taken leadership of the world, China acquired many strategic assets around the world.

One of such assets is the Darwin port in Australia’s Northern Territory. The strategic port is now in the hands of a Chinese company on a 99-year lease that Australia cannot cancel. This is an apparent security threat for Canberra and its allies. So, Morrison has a new plan- let’s kill the Darwin port altogether.

Also Read

EU’s Chief Ursula von der Leyen Slams Beijing: Will China’s Loyalty Towards Russia Make or Break its Ties with EU?

Thailand vs Cambodia Conflict: A Proxy Arena for U.S.-China Rivalry in Indo-Pacific 

“Russia is China’s proxy — and Beijing is paying for killings in Ukraine”, US Allegations

Australia to kill the Darwin port

Chinese Communist Party (CCP) mouthpiece Global Times recently stated, “Citing clues from the federal budget and a press release from Australian Infrastructure Minister Barnaby Joyce and then confirmation from Australian officials, several Australian media outlets on Thursday reported that the Australian government will announce a new port to be built in the strategically important city of Darwin.”

The CCP mouthpiece, which seems to have been rattled by the latest move, added, “While details remain sketchy if the Australian government follows through with the plan, it would mark Canberra’s renewed attempt to undercut Chinese company Landbridge Group’s 99-year lease over the Port of Darwin.”

Killing the Port of Darwin

As per the Global Times report, “Darwin is a small Australian city with a population of about 150,000 people.”

Naturally, the city of Darwin doesn’t need a second port. One port is more than enough for the city’s shipping grain operations.

So, why does it need a second port? Well, what  Australia could be trying to do is to shift shipping activity away from the Port of Darwin and bring it to the new port instead.

China’s Landbridge could be staring at huge losses

China’s Landbridge Group took over the Port of Darwin’s commercial operations under a 99-year lease in 2015.

Read more: Australia has completely destroyed the Chinese company that took over the Darwin Port in 2015

Landbridge Group has made significant investments in the port during the last six to seven years. The capacity and other facilities of the Port of Darwin have been improved by the Chinese business. The company intends to turn Darwin’s port into a major shipping centre for exporting Australian resources to Asia.

Now, if Australia constructs a new port in Darwin, and as a result, Indian, American, and Japanese corporations begin to use the new port, Landbridge Group may suffer significant losses.

Rather than being a strategic or commercial asset, operating the Port of Darwin may become a burden for the Chinese corporation. The cost of running a port is not insignificant. You must incur significant daily fees to keep the port operational, and if ships do not land at your port, it is effectively a dead investment.

If commercial activities become more of a liability, the Chinese could just depart the Port of Darwin before the 99-year lease expires.

Securing Darwin

Darwin has always been a strategic location for Canberra. Ever since the Japanese bombing raids of the Second World War, Darwin has had a sense of being  Australia’s “strategic frontline”.

This sentiment has only grown stronger in the context of China’s growing economic and military aggression.

Therefore, when the then Country Liberal Party (CLP) Northern Territory government leased out the Port of Darwin to the Chinese State-owned Landbridge Group, it was described as a major security threat. 

Read more: China is planning a pearl harbor-style attack on Port Darwin in Australia

The Barack Obama administration in the US too had expressed its disappointment over the move. According to ABC, a former senior defense official involved in the deliberations at the time said that while then Defence chief Mark Binskin was relaxed, however, the official added, “[others] thought it was unnecessary and potentially dangerous.”

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, also said that “the potential for port disruption by the operator (Landbridge) at crucial times remains one of my big concerns.”

Australia, on the other hand, is hoping to allay any fears by constructing a second port. Furthermore, constructing a new port near the one currently handled by the Chinese gives Australian security personnel a significant edge. They will be able to keep an eye on the Chinese and anticipate any hostile effort to militarise the strategically positioned port.

Australia cannot lawfully kick China out of the Darwin port. So, it has decided to kill the port itself, once and for all.

 

Tags: AustrailiaChinaDarwin Port
ShareTweetSend
TFIGLOBAL News Desk

TFIGLOBAL News Desk

Right Arm. Round the World. Fast.

Also Read

EU’s energy disaster: Russian diesel ban forcing huge price rise – Industry Boss Warns

EU’s energy disaster: Russian diesel ban forcing huge price rise – Industry Boss Warns

July 25, 2025
EU’s Chief Ursula von der Leyen Slams Beijing

EU’s Chief Ursula von der Leyen Slams Beijing: Will China’s Loyalty Towards Russia Make or Break its Ties with EU?

July 25, 2025
Why Are NATO Allies France and UK at Odds with US-Israel Over Palestinian Statehood?

Why Are NATO Allies France and UK at Odds with US-Israel Over Palestinian Statehood?

July 25, 2025
Modi Putin connection: Indian firm exporting military-grade missile explosives to Russia despite US sanction warnings – Reports

Modi Putin connection: Indian firm exporting military-grade missile explosives to Russia despite US sanction warnings – Reports

July 24, 2025
EU Continuing to Enhance Ukraine’s Air Defence

EU Continuing to Enhance Ukraine’s Air Defence While Escalating Sanctions on Russia. What’s Next?

July 24, 2025
Armenia to betray Russia and give US a “Trump Corridor”? As NATO eyes crucial region to flank Russia, Putin to make his move?

Armenia to betray Russia and give US a “Trump Corridor”? As NATO eyes crucial region to flank Russia, Putin to make his move?

July 24, 2025
Youtube Twitter Facebook
TFIGlobalTFIGlobal
Right Arm. Round the World. FAST.
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • TFIPOST – English
  • TFIPOST हिन्दी
  • Careers
  • Brand Partnerships
  • Terms of use
  • Privacy Policy

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • Indo-Pacific
  • Americas
  • Canada
  • Indian Subcontinent
  • West Asia
  • Europe
  • Africa
  • The Caribbean
TFIPOST English
TFIPOST हिन्दी

©2025 - TFI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. View our Privacy and Cookie Policy.